Category Archives: Ketamine doctors in ALexandria

KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER NORTHERN VIRGINIA| 703-844-0184 |DR. SENDI | NOVA HEALTH RECOVERY | KETAMINE DEPRESSION PTSD ANXIETY THERAPY | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER VIRGINIA| Spravato | 703-844-0184 | From Popular Anesthetic to Antidepressant, Ketamine Isn’t the Drug You Think It Is | FAIRFAX, VA 22101 | LOUDON COUNTY, VA 20176 | DR. SENDI | 703-844-0184 | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE CENTER | ESKETAMINE DOCTOR | 703-844-0184 | ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22207 22213 | NASAL SPRAY KETAMINE AND THE FDA APPROVAL| DR. SENDI | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER | NASAL SPRY KETAMINE THERAPY | KETAMINE FOR TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION, PTSD, ANXIETY | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE DEPRESSION | KETAMINE PTSD | EMAIL@NOVAHEALTHRECOVERY.COM | 2220 22182 23103 22039 20197 20184 22101 22102 22066 | CBD DOCTOR CBD CENTER | 703-844-0184 | FAIRFAX, VA 22034 | 22308 | ESKETAMINE LOUDON COUNTY, VA | ESKETAMINE ANNANDALE, VA | ESKETAMINE RICHMOND | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | KETAMINE SPRAY PROVIDER IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA 22308 | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | 703-844-0184 FOR AN APPOINTMENT | CBD PROVIDER | CBD CENTER | CBD VIRGINIA | DR. SENDI | NORTHERN VIRGINIA KETAMINE | KETAMINE CENTER | NASAL SPRAY KETAMINE | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER |MAGNESIUM AND COPPER AND DEPRESSION | NEW TREATMENTS FOR DEPRESSION | LOUDON COUNTY KETAMINE 703-844-0184 NORTHERN VIRGINIA | ARLINGTON, VA KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER



NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call for esketamine and nasal ketamine as well as IV Ketamine for depression, PTSD, anxiety  703-844-0184 < Link

Call NOVA Health Recovery at 703-844-0184 for a free consultation for a Ketamine infusion. No referral needed. We offer intranasal Ketamine follow up therapy as well. Alexandria, Va 22306.

Call NOVA Health Recovery at 703-844-0184 for a free consultation for a Ketamine infusion. No referral needed. We offer intranasal Ketamine follow up therapy as well. Alexandria, Va 22306.

From Popular Anesthetic to Antidepressant, Ketamine Isn’t the Drug You Think It Is

An hour before we spoke, Darragh O’Carroll, an emergency room physician from Hawaii, had just given an elderly patient a sedating shot of ketamine. The man had pneumonia and was acting confused and fidgety, making him hard to treat.

“Not only it was a pain control for him when I was putting needles into his neck, but it also kept him still,” O’Carroll says. “And with very minimal risk of lowering his blood pressure.”

Ketamine’s use as an anesthetic — and not as a party drug — is widespread, though not commonly known. In fact, the World Health Organizationestimates ketamine is the most widely used anesthetic in the world and keeps it on their list of essential medicines, a category of drugs that all developed countries should have on hand.

O’Carroll has described ketamine as his “favorite medicine of all time” in an article for Tonic, not only because the anesthetic is incredibly safe and effective, but also because of its versatility. It’s most widely used in surgery, but could also help treat severe asthma, chronic pain, and may even possess anti-tumor properties. In the last two decades, ketamine has also emerged as a potent antidepressant, able to treat symptoms of some mental illnesses in less than 72 hours.

“I think the more research that goes into ketamine, the more uses that we find for it,” O’Carroll says.

From PCP to Painkiller

Ketamine’s story begins with a drug called PCP. Yes, that PCP — phencyclidine or so-called “angel dust,” a drug that when smoked can cause a trance-like state, agitation and out-of-body hallucinations. After it was first synthesized by medicinal chemist Victor Maddox in 1956, the drug was briefly approved as an anesthetic by the FDA for its sedative properties. In tests with a wild rhesus monkey, for example, researchers put their fingers in the previously aggressive animal’s mouth and watched its jaw remain slack.

But while it was safe and effective for pain relief, the side effects of PCP soon became too obvious to ignore.

Some patients under the influence of PCP would feel like they lost their arms or legs or that they were floating in space. It could also cause seizures and delirium. Scientists began seeking a shorter-acting anesthetic without convulsant properties. In 1962, chemistry professor Calvin Stevens discovered a PCP analogue that fit the bill: ketamine.

Ketamine is a potent, sedating painkiller that can cause amnesia and is mostly used in surgery and veterinary medicine. During the Vietnam Invasion, ketamine saw widespread use in the U.S. military because it has several advantages over opioids. First, unlike morphine, ketamine doesn’t suppress blood pressure or breathing. It also doesn’t need to be refrigerated, making it useful in the field or in rural areas that don’t have access to electricity.

Ketamine’s benefits extend beyond use as an anesthetic, though — in some cases it can serve as a balm for the mind as well. A 2008 analysis found that burn victims who were given ketamine were less likely to develop symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, even if their injuries were more severe. Those findings have been replicated, such as a 2014 clinical trial of 41 patients, who saw their PTSD symptoms diminish within 24 hours, an effect that lasted for two weeks.

“When somebody gets one of their limbs dramatically blown off or is shot in the face, it’s a very traumatic event,” O’Carroll says. In such a situation, giving ketamine not only provides instant pain relief, it could prevent long-lasting trauma.

Because its chemical structure is so similar to PCP, ketamine can still give lucid hallucinations, such as feeling that your mind has separated from the body — a dissociative state users sometimes call a “K-hole.” One recent study based on users’ written reports even indicated that this kind of experience might be a close analogue to a near-death experience. However, these dissociative states only happen at high doses — the amount of ketamine used to for surgery and to treat depression is typically much lower.

But ketamine’s side effects are less common and easier to manage than PCP. In fact, ketamine is one of the safest drugs used in medicine today and can even be given to young children. For example, ketamine was used to sedatethe boys’ soccer team trapped in a cave in Thailand last year. Putting the kids in a tranquilized state made it easier to rescue them, and ketamine is safer than the opioids or benzodiazepines that are also commonly used as sedatives.  

Ketamine as Antidepressant

But it wasn’t until the 1990s that what could turn out to be ketamine’s most important function was discovered. A team from Yale University School of Medicine was examining the role of glutamate, a common neurotransmitter, in depression, and discovered something remarkable: ketamine could rapidly relieve depression symptoms.

“To our surprise, the patients started saying, they were better in a few hours,” Dennis Charney, one of the researchers, told Bloomberg. This rapid relief was unheard of in psychiatry.

Glutamate is associated with neural plasticity, our brain’s ability to adapt and change at the level of the neuron. Ketamine blocks certain glutamate receptors, but not others, and the end effect could be to promote the growth of new neurons while protecting old ones. This could explain how ketamine can help reset the brain, though the theory hasn’t yet been definitively proven.

The prescription meds currently on the market for depression have some major drawbacks. Drugs like Prozac or Wellbutrin can take a few weeks or months to kick in while worsening symptoms in the short term — not a good combination, especially for someone who is extremely depressed, or even suicidal.

It took around a decade for mainstream science to take notice of these early ketamine-depression studies. But once it did, ketamine clinics began popping up all across North America, offering fast relief for depression, anxiety and other mental illnesses. Patients are given an infusion — an IV drip that lasts about an hour — and many people, but not everyone, have seen rapid relief of their symptoms.

Suddenly, ketamine infusions became trendy, though the science to back up some of the medical claims is still inconclusive, according to STAT. However, ketamine infusions are rarely covered by insurance, although that is changing. A typical session can run $700, with many patients taking six sessions or more. But many of these patients have so-called treatment-resistant depression. They’ve tried other medications or therapies without success and some see ketamine as a last resort.

Steven Mandel, a clinical psychologist and anesthesiologist, has used ketamine on patients since it first came on the market around 50 years ago. In 2014, he began using it for patients with depression and opened Ketamine Clinics of Los Angeles, one of the oldest and largest clinics in the country. They’ve done over 8,000 infusions so far.

“Our success rate is better than 83 percent,” Mandel says. For his clinic, success means a 50 percent improvement of depression symptoms for longer than three months.

Ketamine’s success as an antidepressant couldn’t help but attract the attention of major pharmaceutical companies as well. In 2009, Johnson & Johnson began developing their own version of the drug they called esketamine. Rather than an infusion through a vein, it’s dispensed through a nasal spray. The FDA approved their formulation in early March. It was thefirst drug in 35 years to fight depression using a different approach than traditional drugs.

“Esketamine is a giant step forward,” Mandel says. “It means we’re not going to be demonizing mind-altering substances used for therapeutic purposes. It opens the door to research on LSD, on psilocybin, on MDMA and many other agents that could possibly relieve a great deal of suffering.”

But many clinicians have raised concerns about long-term side effects, such as heart and bladder toxicity. Others have been critical of esketamine, saying there isn’t enough data yet to suggest the drug is safe or effective. Husseini Manji, a neuroscientist who helped develop the drug for Johnson & Johnson at their subsidiary Janssen, has pushed back against these claims.

“When you line up the totality of the studies, it was really an overwhelming amount of data that was all in the same direction,” Manji says in a call. Though just two of the five late-state clinical trials showed significant results, the changes in mood in the three that fell short were “almost identical in magnitude” to the others, Manji says. It was enough for the drug to meet standards for FDA approval.

We can probably expect other ketamine-related drugs to come to market soon. ATAI Life Sciences, a company funding research on the use of magic mushrooms for depression, is developing their own ketamine depression drug. The pharmaceutical company Allergan also developed rapastinel, another ketamine-like drug, though it failed to show any real benefits for patients in later trials. Manji says this is unfortunate for people who could be helped by these kinds of drugs.

“From a patient standpoint, we were hoping it would work,” he says, even though he was not involved in rapastinel’s development. “But sometimes if you really haven’t got the mechanism right and you haven’t really threaded the needle, then sometimes you don’t see these results.”

Drug of Abuse?

Even though ketamine’s medical uses are well-established, most people have only heard of ketamine in the context of a party drug. Because of this bad reputation — and what’s perceived as growing misuse of the drug — several countries, such as China and the UK, have tried to place greater restrictions on ketamine. This would make it harder to study and more expensive in clinical use.

“If it was to ever be rescheduled, places that would be first affected would be you know places that need it most,” O’Carroll says. The WHO has asked at least four times for countries to keep access to ketamine open. “The medical benefits of ketamine far outweigh potential harm from recreational use,” Marie-Paule Kieny, assistant director general for Health Systems and Innovation at WHO, said in 2015.

So far, no countries have put greater restrictions on ketamine, and that’s probably a good thing. Ketamine has a rich history, but its future is still being written.



Ketamine Center Northern Virginia | 703-844-0184 | NOVA Health Recovery | Spravato Ketamine nasal spray Center |Alexandria, Va 22306 | Ketamine for depression and PTSD | 22304 |20176 | 703-844-0184 | 22101



Call NOVA Health Recovery at 703-844-0184 for a free consultation for a Ketamine infusion. No referral needed. We offer intranasal Ketamine follow up therapy as well. Alexandria, Va 22306.

Call NOVA Health Recovery at 703-844-0184 for a free consultation for a Ketamine infusion. No referral needed. We offer intranasal Ketamine follow up therapy as well. Alexandria, Va 22306.

VA to offer new ketamine-based nasal spray to help combat depression

The newest FDA-approved medication to treat severe depression, a nasal spray based on the anesthetic (and misused hallucinogenic party drug) ketamine, will soon be available to veterans treated within the Department of Veterans Affairs.

In a move that may help thousands of former service members with depression that has not improved with other treatments, VA officials announced Tuesday that the department’s doctors are now authorized to prescribe Spravato, the brand name for esketamine, a molecular variation of ketamine.

The decision to offer a drug hailed by many as a breakthrough in treatment for its speedy results — often relieving symptoms in hours and days, not weeks — shows the VA’s “commitment to seek new ways to provide the best health care available for our nation’s veterans,” Secretary Robert Wilkie said in a release.

“We’re pleased to be able to expand options for Veterans with depression who have not responded to other treatments,” Wilkie added.

The treatment will be available to veterans based on a physician’s assessment and only will be administered to patients who have tried at least two antidepressant medications and continue to have symptoms of major depressive disorder.

An estimated 16 million Americans have had at least one major episode of depression, and of those, 1 in 3 are considered treatment-resistant. In the veteran population of 20 million, the estimated diagnosis rate of depression is 14 percent — up to 2.8 million veterans. Between one-third and half of those veterans may be treatment-resistant.

The lack of effective medications for difficult-to-treat patients prompted the Food and Drug Administration to place esketamine on a fast track, expediting its review of the drug to ensure that it went to patent as soon as safely possible, according to administration officials.

“Controlled clinical trials that studied the safety and efficacy of this drug, along with careful review through the FDA’s drug approval process, including a robust discussion with our external advisory committees, were important in our decision to approve this treatment,” said Dr. Tiffany Farchione, acting director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Division of Psychiatry Products, in a release.

As with any other medication, there are risks. Spravato carries a boxed warning for side effects that include misuse, the reason it is administered under a doctor’s supervision. The list of side effects includes sedation and blood pressure spikes and disassociation, such as feelings of physical paralysis and out-of-body experiences. It also can cause suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Acknowledging the dangers, FDA made esketamine available only through a restricted distribution system.

A veteran prescribed Spravato would inhale the nasal spray at a medical facility while under supervision of a medical provider, and would be monitored for at least two hours after receiving the dose. A typical prescription includes twice-weekly doses the first month, followed by a single dose weekly or biweekly as needed. Spravato cannot be dispensed for home use.

Spravato is made by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. It is the first major antidepressant medication to hit the market in 30 years.



Ketamine Infusion Center Northern Virginia| 703-844-0184 |Dr. Sendi | NOVA Health recovery | Ketamine Depression PTSD Anxiety Therapy | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER VIRGINIA| 703-844-0184 | NOVA HEALTH RECOVERY | FAIRFAX, VA 22101 | LOUDON COUNTY, VA 20176 | DR. SEND | 703-844-0184 | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE CENTER | ESKETAMINE DOCTOR | 703-844-0184 | ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22207 22213 | NASAL SPRAY KETAMINE AND THE FDA APPROVAL| DR. SENDI | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER | NASAL SPRY KETAMINE THERAPY | KETAMINE FOR TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION, PTSD, ANXIETY | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE DEPRESSION | KETAMINE PTSD | EMAIL@NOVAHEALTHRECOVERY.COM | 2220 22182 23103 22039 20197 20184 22101 22102 22066 | CBD DOCTOR CBD CENTER | 703-844-0184 | FAIRFAX, VA 22034 | 22308 | ESKETAMINE LOUDON COUNTY, VA | ESKETAMINE ANNANDALE, VA | ESKETAMINE RICHMOND | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | KETAMINE SPRAY PROVIDER IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA 22308 | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | 703-844-0184 FOR AN APPOINTMENT | CBD PROVIDER | CBD CENTER | CBD VIRGINIA | DR. SENDI | NORTHERN VIRGINIA KETAMINE | KETAMINE CENTER |MAGNESIUM AND COPPER AND DEPRESSION | NEW TREATMENTS FOR DEPRESSION | LOUDON COUNTY KETAMINE 703-844-0184 NORTHERN VIRGINIA | ARLINGTON, VA KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER



NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call for esketamine and nasal ketamine as well as IV Ketamine for depression, PTSD, anxiety  703-844-0184 < Link

Ketamine Virginia Link

Twitter feed Ketamine – Ablow

Ketamine Seems to Ease Depression. We’ll Soon See What Else It Does.



Clinical trials are not enough to prove any drug is safe and effective – especially one that could be as widely used as Johnson & Johnson’s depression drug esketamine, a slightly altered form of the street drug ketamine. The FDA approval process is a balancing act, weighing safety and efficacy testing against the need to get potentially life-saving drugs out as soon as possible.

An advisory panel to the FDA decided this month that the benefits outweigh the risks, and approval is expected soon. But scientists who study depression say there’s a lot more to learn about esketamine’s long-term effects.

While best known as a recreational drug, ketamine has been used since the 1970s as an anesthetic, in doses much higher than what’s likely to be given to depression patients. The trials so far seem to show that the drug is not highly addictive, according to a story in the medical website STAT. But time will tell.

The most promising clinical trials followed people whose depression had been resistant to conventional therapy. Fifty percent of patients improved when given conventional therapy plus a placebo, as compared to 70 percent who got conventional therapy and esketamine.

Taking the drug will be a lot more complicated than taking Prozac. It’s been formulated so that it can be delivered as a nasal spray, but people have to get the drug at a doctor’s office, and they won’t be allowed to drive for at least 24 hours, said Gerard Sanacora, a Yale University psychiatrist who has been involved in the clinical trials.

He said he believes there’s potential for benefit, because the drug works for some people who get no relief from conventional treatments and because works faster, which might even prevent suicide. But there’s a lot more to learn about the drug’s potential long-term consequences. So far it looks like people will get two treatments a week to start, then one for maintenance. But scientists don’t know whether it can be tapered down further, or discontinued, and whether there’s a risk for relapse, he said.

Sanacora said that ketamine is based on a very different model of how depression works. Standard therapy is based on the principle that depression is a chemical imbalance involving the transmitting chemical serotonin. But an alternative view started to take shape in the 1990s that depression was more of a problem with the connections between neurons, triggered by chronic stress and mediated by something called the glutaminergic system.

Because ketamine interacts with this system, researchers started testing it as a depression drug. Although it seems effective, there’s still no agreement on how depression actually works – and there is some concern that it might work very differently in different patients.

Ketamine can affect cardiovascular health, and in the short term can cause patients to lose their sense of their bodies’ position in space – the sense of proprioception. They sometimes feel their arms are floating.

That hasn’t stopped people from flocking to clinics to get treated with IV ketamine infusions for depression and other problems. This is legal because the drug is approved for anesthesia, and prescribers can use it off-label for other purposes. An investigation by the medical website STAT raised concerns that clinic staff didn’t have the necessary expertise, and there was considerable marketing hype in many cases. The infusions cost between $350 and $1,000 each, and can go on for five or six treatments.

Another red flag popped up last week when the Boston Globe ran a storyabout three women who claim to have been sexually abused by psychiatrist Keith Ablow – a frequent commentator for Fox News. The Globe reported that Ablow was treating the women with ketamine, and one expert cited in the lawsuits said a patient had become “very dependent on this medication and dependent on Dr. Ablow to supply it.”

Ablow’s Twitter feed is full of positive stories about ketamine in places such as Reader’s Digest, followed by a phone number to call for a “free ketamine screening.” The allegations illustration that it’s not just patients that will need to be tracked for abuse, but the doctors as well.

On the positive side, FDA approval would give patients who want the drug a standardized treatment that would be covered by many insurance plans. Approval also creates an opportunity to collect data on longer-term use. (An earlier column exploring the promise of big data in medicine points out that clinical trials are often not long-running enough or big enough to catch even deadly side effects.)

Yale’s Sanacora thinks of the next series of trials as Phase 4. Sanacora also brought up what he poignantly called the “Flowers for Algernon” effect, referring to the short story in which the main character, Charlie Gordon, is treated for an intellectual disability. The treatment works, but eventually wears off, leaving Charlie back where he started. The disappointment makes for a tragic tale. An arc like this would be the last thing depression patients need – though if no other treatment is helping, it might be a risk worth taking.

KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER VIRGINIA| 703-844-0184 | NOVA HEALTH RECOVERY | FAIRFAX, VA 22101 | Loudon County, Va 20176 | Dr. Send | 703-844-0184 | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE CENTER | ESKETAMINE DOCTOR | 703-844-0184 | ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22207 22213 | NASAL SPRAY KETAMINE AND THE FDA APPROVAL| DR. SENDI | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER | NASAL SPRY KETAMINE THERAPY | KETAMINE FOR TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION, PTSD, ANXIETY | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE DEPRESSION | KETAMINE PTSD | EMAIL@NOVAHEALTHRECOVERY.COM | 2220 22182 23103 22039 20197 20184 22101 22102 22066 | CBD DOCTOR CBD CENTER | 703-844-0184 | FAIRFAX, VA 22034 | 22308 | ESKETAMINE LOUDON COUNTY, VA | ESKETAMINE ANNANDALE, VA | ESKETAMINE RICHMOND | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | KETAMINE SPRAY PROVIDER IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA 22308 | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | 703-844-0184 FOR AN APPOINTMENT | CBD PROVIDER | CBD CENTER | CBD VIRGINIA | DR. SENDI | NORTHERN VIRGINIA KETAMINE | KETAMINE CENTER |MAGNESIUM AND COPPER AND DEPRESSION | NEW TREATMENTS FOR DEPRESSION | LOUDON COUNTY KETAMINE 703-844-0184 NORTHERN VIRGINIA | Arlington, Va Ketamine Infusion Center

NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call for esketamine and nasal ketamine as well as IV Ketamine for depression, PTSD, anxiety  703-844-0184 < Link

Ketamine Virginia Link

NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call for esketamine and nasal ketamine as well as IV Ketamine for depression, PTSD, anxiety  703-844-0184 < Link

Ketamine Virginia Link



Ketamine Works as a Fast-Acting Antidepressant, But the Full Effects Are Still Unknown

Ketamine Works as a Fast-Acting Antidepressant, But the Full Effects Are Still Unknown

etamine leads something of a double life, straddling the line between medical science and party drug. Since it’s invention in the early 1960s, ketamine has enjoyed a quiet existence as a veterinary and pediatric anesthetic given in high doses. But in a second, wilder life, ketamine’s effects at lower doses—a profound sense of dissociation from self and body—became an illicit favorite among psychedelic enthusiasts. Pioneering neuroscientist John Lilly, who famously attempted to facilitate communication between humans and dolphins, used the drug in the late 1970s during experiments in sensory deprivation tanks. By the 1990s, the drug had made its way to the dance floor as “special K.”

More recently, ketamine has taken on a third, wholly unexpected role. Since the early 2000s, the drug has been studied as a uniquely powerful medication for treating severe depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). When given as an intravenous infusion, ketamine can lift symptoms of depression and OCD from patients who fail to respond to common antidepressants like Prozac and even resist treatments like electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Exactly how ketamine produces antidepressant effects remains unclear, however. Antidepressants like Prozac are Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) that increase levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin in the brain, which is believed to boost mood. Ketamine’s main mechanism of action to produce dissociative anesthetic effects, on the other hand, depends on another neurotransmitter, glutamate.

“The prevailing hypothesis for ketamine’s antidepressant effect is that it blocks a receptor (or docking port) for glutamate,” says Carolyn Rodriguez, a professor of psychiatry at Stanford who has conducted some of the pioneering research into ketamine as an OCD treatment.

However, new research suggests that ketamine’s influence on glutamate receptors, and specifically the NMDA receptor, may not be the sole cause of its antidepressant effects. According to a recent study in the American Journal of Psychiatry by Rodriguez and her Stanford colleagues, ketamine might also activate a third system in the brain: opioid receptors.

Ketamine is known to bind weakly to the mu opioid receptor, acting as an agonist to produce a physiological response at the same site in the brain where narcotics like morphine exert their influence. It’s also known that opioids can have antidepressant effects, says Alan Schatzberg, a professor of psychiatry at Stanford and co-author of the new study.

It never made sense to Schatzberg that ketamine’s antidepressant effects were a result of blocking the glutamate receptors, as attempts to use other glutamate-blocking drugs as antidepressants have largely failed. The Stanford psychiatrist, who has spent his career studying depression, wondered if researchers were unknowingly activating opioid receptors with ketamine.

“You could test this by using an antagonist of the opioid system to see if you blocked the effect in people who are ketamine responders,” he says. “And that’s what we did.”

The researchers enlisted 12 subjects with treatment-resistant depression and gave them either an infusion of ketamine preceded by a placebo, or ketamine preceded by a dose of naltrexone, an opioid receptor blocker. Of those, seven subjects responded to the ketamine with placebo, “and it was very dramatic,” Schatzberg says, with depression lifting by the next day. “But in the other condition, they showed no effect,” suggesting it was the opioid receptor activity, not blocking glutamate receptors, that was responsible.

While opioid blockers prevented ketamine from activating the associated receptors, it did not block the drugs dissociative effects, suggesting dissociation alone won’t affect depression. “It’s not that, ‘hey, we’ll get you a little weird and you’ll get the effect,’” Schatzberg says.

The appeal of ketamine’s use as an antidepressant is clear enough. While more typical antidepressants may require six to eight weeks to produce benefits, ketamine works within hours.

“Our patients are asked to hang in there until the medication and talk therapy takes effect,” says Carlos Zarate, chief of the experimental therapeutics and pathophysiology branch of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) who was not associated with the new study. While waiting for traditional treatments to kick in, patients “may lose their friends or even attempt suicide.”

But the study linking ketamine to opioid activity means an extra dose of caution is required. While ketamine acts quickly, the anti-depressive effects of the drug only last for a few days to a week, meaning repeat doses would be needed in practice. Researchers and clinicians should consider the risk of addiction in long-term use, Schatzberg says. “You’re going to eventually get into some form of tolerance I think, and that’s not good.”

However, the new finding is based on just seven subjects, and it still needs to be replicated by other scientists, says Yale professor of psychiatry Greg Sanacora, who was not involved in the new study. And even if the trial is replicated, it would not prove ketamine’s opioid activity is responsible for its antidepressant effects.

“It doesn’t show that at all,” says Sanacora, who studies glutamate, mood disorders and ketamine. “It shows that the opioid system needs to be functioning in order to get this response.”

Sanacora compares the new study to using antibiotics to treat an ear infection. If you administered an additional drug that blocks absorption of antibiotics in the stomach, you would block treatment of the ear infection, but you wouldn’t conclude that antibiotics fight ear infections through stomach absorption—you just need a normally functioning stomach to allow the antibiotic to do its job. Similarly, opioid receptors might need to be functioning normally for ketamine to produce antidepressant effects, even if opioid activity is not directly responsible for those effects.

Complicating matters further, placebos often cause patients to experience less pain, but opioid blockers like naltrexone have been shown to prevent this response, according to Sanacora. It could be, he suggests, that all the apparatus of the clinic—the nursing staff, the equipment—exerted a placebo effect that is mediated by the brain’s opioid system, and the patients who received naltrexone simply did not respond to that placebo effect

“That’s a very important and powerful tool that is in all of medicine, not just in psychiatry,” Sanacora says. “And we know that the opiate system is involved, to some extent, in that type of response.”

It’s also possible, the researchers note in the paper, that ketamine’s action at the glutamate receptor is still important. “Ketamine acts in three distinct phases—rapid effects, sustained effects and return to baseline,” Rodriguez says. Opioid signaling may turn out to mediate ketamine’s rapid effects, while “the glutamate system may be responsible for the sustaining effects after ketamine is metabolized.”

One interpretation is that ketamine blocks glutamate receptors on neurons that are inhibitory, meaning they signal other neurons to fire fewer signals. By blocking these neurons from firing, ketamine may enhance glutamate activity in the rest of the brain, producing anti-depressive effects that persist after the opioid activity dies down.

“The reality is it’s in a gray zone,” Sanacora says. “This is just one small piece of a very large puzzle or concern that we really need to look at the data in total.”

That data is forthcoming. Results from a Janssen Pharmaceuticals clinical trial using esketamine, an isomer of ketamine, and involving hundreds of subjects will soon become public, according to Sanacora, who has consulted for the company. And at NIMH, Zarate and colleagues are studying hydroxynorketamine, a metabolite of ketamine that may provide the same benefits but without the dissociative side effects

Ketamine Works as a Fast-Acting Antidepressant, But the Full Effects Are Still Unknown

A new study suggests that ketamine activates the brain’s opioid receptors, complicating its use to treat clinical depression

Ketamine Syringe
Ketamine syringe, 10mg held by a healthcare professional. (Peter Cripps / Alamy Stock Photo)

By Jon KelveySEPTEMBER 11, 2018777110231.1K

Ketamine leads something of a double life, straddling the line between medical science and party drug. Since it’s invention in the early 1960s, ketamine has enjoyed a quiet existence as a veterinary and pediatric anesthetic given in high doses. But in a second, wilder life, ketamine’s effects at lower doses—a profound sense of dissociation from self and body—became an illicit favorite among psychedelic enthusiasts. Pioneering neuroscientist John Lilly, who famously attempted to facilitate communication between humans and dolphins, used the drug in the late 1970s during experiments in sensory deprivation tanks. By the 1990s, the drug had made its way to the dance floor as “special K.”

More recently, ketamine has taken on a third, wholly unexpected role. Since the early 2000s, the drug has been studied as a uniquely powerful medication for treating severe depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). When given as an intravenous infusion, ketamine can lift symptoms of depression and OCD from patients who fail to respond to common antidepressants like Prozac and even resist treatments like electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Exactly how ketamine produces antidepressant effects remains unclear, however. Antidepressants like Prozac are Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) that increase levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin in the brain, which is believed to boost mood. Ketamine’s main mechanism of action to produce dissociative anesthetic effects, on the other hand, depends on another neurotransmitter, glutamate.

“The prevailing hypothesis for ketamine’s antidepressant effect is that it blocks a receptor (or docking port) for glutamate,” says Carolyn Rodriguez, a professor of psychiatry at Stanford who has conducted some of the pioneering research into ketamine as an OCD treatment.

However, new research suggests that ketamine’s influence on glutamate receptors, and specifically the NMDA receptor, may not be the sole cause of its antidepressant effects. According to a recent study in the American Journal of Psychiatry by Rodriguez and her Stanford colleagues, ketamine might also activate a third system in the brain: opioid receptors.

Ketamine is known to bind weakly to the mu opioid receptor, acting as an agonist to produce a physiological response at the same site in the brain where narcotics like morphine exert their influence. It’s also known that opioids can have antidepressant effects, says Alan Schatzberg, a professor of psychiatry at Stanford and co-author of the new study.

It never made sense to Schatzberg that ketamine’s antidepressant effects were a result of blocking the glutamate receptors, as attempts to use other glutamate-blocking drugs as antidepressants have largely failed. The Stanford psychiatrist, who has spent his career studying depression, wondered if researchers were unknowingly activating opioid receptors with ketamine.

“You could test this by using an antagonist of the opioid system to see if you blocked the effect in people who are ketamine responders,” he says. “And that’s what we did.”

The researchers enlisted 12 subjects with treatment-resistant depression and gave them either an infusion of ketamine preceded by a placebo, or ketamine preceded by a dose of naltrexone, an opioid receptor blocker. Of those, seven subjects responded to the ketamine with placebo, “and it was very dramatic,” Schatzberg says, with depression lifting by the next day. “But in the other condition, they showed no effect,” suggesting it was the opioid receptor activity, not blocking glutamate receptors, that was responsible.

While opioid blockers prevented ketamine from activating the associated receptors, it did not block the drugs dissociative effects, suggesting dissociation alone won’t affect depression. “It’s not that, ‘hey, we’ll get you a little weird and you’ll get the effect,’” Schatzberg says.

The appeal of ketamine’s use as an antidepressant is clear enough. While more typical antidepressants may require six to eight weeks to produce benefits, ketamine works within hours.

“Our patients are asked to hang in there until the medication and talk therapy takes effect,” says Carlos Zarate, chief of the experimental therapeutics and pathophysiology branch of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) who was not associated with the new study. While waiting for traditional treatments to kick in, patients “may lose their friends or even attempt suicide.”

<

A treatment that works within 24 hours? “That’s huge.”

A vial of ketamine. The drug is used primarily as an anesthetic but is gaining popularity as an effective antidepressant.
A vial of ketamine. The drug is used primarily as an anesthetic but is gaining popularity as an effective antidepressant. (Wikimedia Commons)

But the study linking ketamine to opioid activity means an extra dose of caution is required. While ketamine acts quickly, the anti-depressive effects of the drug only last for a few days to a week, meaning repeat doses would be needed in practice. Researchers and clinicians should consider the risk of addiction in long-term use, Schatzberg says. “You’re going to eventually get into some form of tolerance I think, and that’s not good.”

However, the new finding is based on just seven subjects, and it still needs to be replicated by other scientists, says Yale professor of psychiatry Greg Sanacora, who was not involved in the new study. And even if the trial is replicated, it would not prove ketamine’s opioid activity is responsible for its antidepressant effects.

“It doesn’t show that at all,” says Sanacora, who studies glutamate, mood disorders and ketamine. “It shows that the opioid system needs to be functioning in order to get this response.”

Sanacora compares the new study to using antibiotics to treat an ear infection. If you administered an additional drug that blocks absorption of antibiotics in the stomach, you would block treatment of the ear infection, but you wouldn’t conclude that antibiotics fight ear infections through stomach absorption—you just need a normally functioning stomach to allow the antibiotic to do its job. Similarly, opioid receptors might need to be functioning normally for ketamine to produce antidepressant effects, even if opioid activity is not directly responsible for those effects.

Complicating matters further, placebos often cause patients to experience less pain, but opioid blockers like naltrexone have been shown to prevent this response, according to Sanacora. It could be, he suggests, that all the apparatus of the clinic—the nursing staff, the equipment—exerted a placebo effect that is mediated by the brain’s opioid system, and the patients who received naltrexone simply did not respond to that placebo effect.

“That’s a very important and powerful tool that is in all of medicine, not just in psychiatry,” Sanacora says. “And we know that the opiate system is involved, to some extent, in that type of response.”

It’s also possible, the researchers note in the paper, that ketamine’s action at the glutamate receptor is still important. “Ketamine acts in three distinct phases—rapid effects, sustained effects and return to baseline,” Rodriguez says. Opioid signaling may turn out to mediate ketamine’s rapid effects, while “the glutamate system may be responsible for the sustaining effects after ketamine is metabolized.”

One interpretation is that ketamine blocks glutamate receptors on neurons that are inhibitory, meaning they signal other neurons to fire fewer signals. By blocking these neurons from firing, ketamine may enhance glutamate activity in the rest of the brain, producing anti-depressive effects that persist after the opioid activity dies down.

“The reality is it’s in a gray zone,” Sanacora says. “This is just one small piece of a very large puzzle or concern that we really need to look at the data in total.”

That data is forthcoming. Results from a Janssen Pharmaceuticals clinical trial using esketamine, an isomer of ketamine, and involving hundreds of subjects will soon become public, according to Sanacora, who has consulted for the company. And at NIMH, Zarate and colleagues are studying hydroxynorketamine, a metabolite of ketamine that may provide the same benefits but without the dissociative side effects.

The ultimate goal of all this research is to find a ketamine-like drug with fewer liabilities, and that aim is bringing researchers back to the fundamentals of science.

“For me, one of the exciting parts of this study is that it suggests that ketamine’s mechanism is complicated, it acts on different receptors beyond glutamate and is the start of this exciting dialogue,” Rodriguez says. “Sometimes great science raises more questions than answers.”



KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER VIRGINIA| 703-844-0184 | NOVA HEALTH RECOVERY | Fairfax, VA 22101 | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE CENTER | ESKETAMINE DOCTOR | 703-844-0184 | ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22207 22213 | NASAL SPRAY KETAMINE AND THE FDA APPROVAL| DR. SENDI | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER | NASAL SPRY KETAMINE THERAPY | KETAMINE FOR TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION, PTSD, ANXIETY | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE DEPRESSION | KETAMINE PTSD | EMAIL@NOVAHEALTHRECOVERY.COM | 2220 22182 23103 22039 20197 20184 22101 22102 22066 | CBD DOCTOR CBD CENTER | 703-844-0184 | FAIRFAX, VA 22034 | 22308 | ESKETAMINE LOUDON COUNTY, VA | ESKETAMINE ANNANDALE, VA | ESKETAMINE RICHMOND | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | KETAMINE SPRAY PROVIDER IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA 22308 | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | KETAMINE VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | 703-844-0184 FOR AN APPOINTMENT | CBD PROVIDER | CBD CENTER | CBD VIRGINIA | DR. SENDI | NORTHERN VIRGINIA KETAMINE | KETAMINE CENTER |Magnesium and Copper and Depression | New treatments for depression | Loudon County Ketamine 703-844-0184 Northern Virginia

NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call for esketamine and nasal ketamine as well as IV Ketamine for depression, PTSD, anxiety  703-844-0184 < Link

Ketamine Virginia Link

What is interesting for the above articles is the Magnesium and copper components associated with Depression.

The most common biomarkers found are generally related to the regulation of lipid metabolism, control of immunoinflammatory response, control of vascular function, inter and intra-cellular communication. We additionally found that biomarkers related to nutrient sensing and proteostasis are related to LLD. Altogether, these studies suggest that there are core abnormalities, which are present in the first depressive episode, continue over mid-life and late-life, and are persistent even after successful antidepressant treatment. This view is consistent with the presence of biological “scars” in depression that render individuals with major depression , age, more vulnerable to systemic illness, disability, cognitive impairment and other negative health outcomes, which are not fully ameliorated despite successful antidepressant treatment . Robust machine learning techniques showed that three proteins (C-peptide, fatty acid-binding protein, and ApoA-IV) have a very high accuracy at discriminating individuals with remitted LLD compared to never depressed control participants. In fact, our study showed the highest discriminatory power of any previous studies, including those for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other common mental illnesses .

http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb

. LLD is associated with significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory and lower levels of anti-inflammatory markers, reduced neurotrophic support, and higher levels of oxidative stress markers and activity of glycogen synthase kinase

I nflammation is a key pathway in the initiation and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD), and inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) have shown consistent associations with incident CHD events (1). In recent years, myeloperoxydase (MPO) has drawn growing attention as a new inflammatory biomarker of CHD risk (2–4). Myeloperoxydase is an enzyme produced by activated leukocytes during the innate immune response that catalyzes the formation of reactive oxidant species. It is present in human atherosclerotic plaques and exhibits a variety of proatherogenic properties (5). Increased inflammation is a key mechanism through which several risk factors increase CHD risk (6). Depression is a risk factor for CHD (7), and whether increased inflammation is involved has attracted considerable interest (8). A role of inflammation in depression was first proposed by Smith in 1991 (9). Since then, several studies have reported a link between major depressive disorder (MDD) or depressive symptoms and a variety of inflammatory and immune biomarkers (10 –15). However, others have found no independent association (16) or mixed results (17–19), and one study even found lower levels of inflammatory biomarkers in depressed cardiac outpatients (20). It is increasingly recognized that the relationship between depression and inflammation is more complex than initially conceived (21). Depression may cause inflammation through altered neuroendocrine function and central adiposity (22). However, depression may also be a consequence of inflammation, since a pathogenic role of inflammatory cytokines in the etiology of depression has been described (23). Although given less consideration, a third possibility is that depression is a marker of some other underlying dimension that is separately linked to depression and inflammation. Recently, it has been proposed that such underlying factor could be a specific genetic makeup (24,25). Evidence for a common genetic substrate for depression and inflammation would be of substantial scientific and clinical interest, because it would suggest that a common biological pathway links these two conditions. We found that MDD is associated with higher levels of inflammation and that this association is particularly robust for MPO, an inflammatory biomarker that was never studied before in relation to depression. However, we also found evidence for genetic confounding in this association. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that there is a common genetic substrate linking MDD and inflammation, suggesting that these two phenotypes share a common pathophysiological mechanism. MPO, Other Inflammatory Markers, and Depression Myeloperoxydase is an enzyme of the innate immune system, which exhibits a wide array of proatherogenic features (5,34). Myeloperoxydase is secreted upon leukocyte activation, contributing to innate host defenses. However, it also increases oxidative stress, thereby contributing to tissue damage during inflammation and atherogenesis. Myeloperoxydase generates numerous reactive oxidants that cause lipid peroxidation, posttranslational modifications to target proteins, and decrease of nitric oxide bioavailability, resulting in oxidation of LDL and apolipoprotein A1, protein carbamylation, and endothelial dysfunction (5,35,36). Transgenic mice containing the human MPO gene show significantly larger atherosclerosis buildup than the wild-type (34,37). In humans, individuals with total or subtotal MPO deficiency, a defect with a frequency of 1 in every 2000 to 4000 whites, are less likely to develop cardiovascular diseases, and those harboring a promoter polymorphism associated with a twofold reduction in MPO expression appear cardioprotected (5,38 – 40). Consistent with these proatherogenic properties, MPO has received growing attention as a novel risk marker for future cardiovascular events (2– 4). Oxidative stress has also been linked to neuronal degeneration in the central nervous system (41,42). Myeloperoxydase is both expressed and enzymatically active in the human brain (43,44) and is associated with Alzheimer’s disease (44). Previous studies have described abnormalities of oxidant-antioxidant systems in MDD suggestive of higher oxidative stress. For example, elevated levels of antioxidant enzymes, particularly superoxide dismutase (SOD), and biomarkers of oxidation, such as malondialdehyde, were found in plasma, red blood cells, or other peripheral tissues of acutely depressed MDD patients compared with control subjects (45– 47). In some cases (46,47), but not others (45), these abnormalities were reduced with antidepressant treatment. Superoxide dismutase coenzyme concentrations are also higher in postmortem brain tissue (prefrontal cortex) of MDD patients than in control brains (48).

MOOD FOOD Project

Esketamine center | Esketamine Doctor | 703-844-0184 | Arlington, Virginia 22207 22213 | NOVA Health Recovery | Dr. Sendi | Esketamine provider | Nasal spry ketamine therapy | Ketamine for treatment of depression, PTSD, anxiety | Ketamine Infusion Center | Ketamine depression | Ketamine PTSD | email@novahealthrecovery.com | 2220 22182 23103 22039 20197 20184 22101 22102 22066 | CBD doctor CBD Center | 703-844-0184 | Fairfax, Va 22034 | 22308 | Esketamine Loudon County, Va | Esketamine Annandale, Va | Esketamine Richmond



 

NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call for esketamine and nasal ketamine as well as IV Ketamine for depression, PTSD, anxiety  703-844-0184

Allergan and Lundbeck await depression and mania data

Allergan needs a win with rapastinel, while Lundbeck’s chief exec faces her second clinical challenge.

Calendar pin 14th

Welcome to your weekly digest of approaching regulatory and clinical readouts. After a tough 2018 Allergan needs some good news, and it will soon find out if its depression project rapastinel will provide it. Three phase III trials of the project are due to yield topline data in the first half of this year.

Rapastinel targets the NMDA receptor, making it similar to Johnson & Johnson’s ketamine enantiomer esketamine. The J&J candidate is under US review with a PDUFA date of May 2019, though continuing US government shutdown could put approval in doubt.

Although the two projects are often mentioned in the same breath they act differently: rapastinel is a partial agonist of the NMDA receptor, while esketamine blocks it. This way, Allergan hopes, its project might not have the same psychomimetic effects as ketamine and, to a lesser extent, esketamine.

Dissociation – becoming less aware of one’s surroundings – has been seen with the J&J project. Allergan will want to show a safety edge with rapastinel, but stronger efficacy versus esketamine would not go amiss either. Still, Bernstein analysts only give rapastinel a 50% chance of success.

The three phase III trials of rapastinel test the project on top of standard antidepressants in patients with a partial response to the existing drugs. The primary endpoint of all three is change in Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) at three weeks.

Esketamine itself had mixed results in its pivotal programme: the Transform-2 trial met its primary endpoint, but Transform-3 and Transform-1 did not. Across the three studies, which tested esketamine on top of an oral antidepressant, the reduction in MADRS score at four weeks was 3.2-4.1 points.

Allergan is also developing an oral NMDA modulator, AGN-241751, but this has only just entered phase II. The company, which faced calls for a break-up last year, needs a nearer-term boost, and with 2024 sales forecasts of $505m rapastinel is its biggest pipeline hope.

Selected upcoming rapastinel phase III readouts
NameSetting Trial ID Primary completion
RAP-MD-01Adjunctive therapy NCT02932943Nov 2018
RAP-MD-02Adjunctive therapy NCT02943564Nov 2018
RAP-MD-03Adjunctive therapy NCT02943577Nov 2018
RAP-MD-06 Long-term safety study, adjunctive therapyNCT03002077Nov 2018
RAP-MD-04 Adjunctive therapy, relapse preventionNCT02951988Sep 2019
RAP-MD-32MonotherapyNCT03560518Feb 2020
RAP-MD-30 MonotherapyNCT03675776Dec 2020
RAP-MD-99 Adjunctive or monotherapyNCT03668600Feb 2021
RAP-MD-33 Monotherapy, relapse preventionNCT03614156Jul 2021
Source: EvaluatePharma, Clinicaltrials.gov.

Second test

The two upcoming phase III readouts for Lundbeck’s antipsychotic Rexulti in bipolar mania might not be game changing: there are already approved drugs for this indication, and existing off-label use of antipsychotics is being fuelled by increasing genericisation.

Still, the data will be interesting as they represent the second clinical stock catalyst for Lundbeck’s new chief executive, Deborah Dunsire. The first was the failure of Lu AF35700 in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and drove shares down almost 30%.

Some analysts do not think that success in bipolar mania will add materially to Rexulti sales, but the downside risk of a second negative trial readout is substantially greater given the lack of other catalysts.

The two bipolar trials have enrolled 322 and 333 patients, the active cohorts given 2-4mg of Rexulti for 21 days, with a six-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is change in the Young-mania rating scale, and a key secondary endpoint is clinical global impression-bipolar (CGI BP) severity-of-illness score in mania.

Even if there is improvement in severity of illness, success in bipolar mania will at best be a nice-to-have addition to Rexulti’s current uses in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, according to analysts at Leerink.

A more exciting event for Lundbeck will be whether Rexulti can have an impact on agitation in Alzheimer’s disease, where Bernstein analysts reckon success could add $1bn of sales. However, previous data have been mixed.

For now, if Rexulti does not deliver the goods in the more immediate bipolar indication, the market could seize it as an opportunity to punish the stock further.

Selected upcoming Rexulti phase III readouts
SettingTrial IDData due
Bipolar manic episodesNCT03259555Q1 2019
Bipolar manic episodesNCT03257865Q1 2019
Alzheimer’s agitationNCT035485842020
Alzheimer’s agitationNCT035941232021
Alzheimer’s agitationNCT037249422021
Source: EvaluatePharma, Clinicaltrials.gov.



ESKETAMINE | 703-844-0184 | KETAMINE INFUSION CENTER | NOVA HEALTH RECOVERY | ALEXANDRIA, VA 22308 | ESKETAMINE VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE PROVIDER | ESKETAMINE DOCTOR | ESKETAMINE FAIRFAX, VA | EMAIL@NOVAHEALTHRECOVERY.COM | NASAL SPRAY KETAMINE | KETAMINE TREATMENT PROVIDER, KETAMINE FOR DEPRESSION, PTSD, ANXIETY, PAIN | 22067 22066 | 22039 |22101 |22182 | 20124 | 20171 | 22207 | 22102 |ESKETAMINE NORTHERN VIRGINIA | ESKETAMINE TREATMENT PROVIDER | CBD PROVIDER | CBD CENTER | CBD DOCTOR |LOUDON COUNTY, VA ESKETAMINE CENTER | 703-844-0184 | ESKETAMINE MARYLAND | NOSE SPRAY KETAMINE

NOVA Health Recovery Ketamine Infusion Center | 703-844-0184 – call for a Ketamine infusion or Ketamine nasal spray to treat your depression Alexandria, Va 22306 EMAIL is email@novahealthrecovery.com

NEW VARIATION OF KETAMINE TO BE APPROVED BY FDA FOR TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION

“The biggest breakthrough in depression treatment since Prozac”

  • 6 FEBRUARY 2019
New variation of ketamine to be approved by FDA for treatment of depression

Back in July of 2017, the world’s first ketamine trial for depression proved to be “incredibly effective” in curing elderly patients. The drug, often referred to as Special K, is a popular substance found clubland culture, but recent breakthrough studies and the development of chemical variations of ketamine has shown that the drug is a powerful tool that can help save lives and allow people to live life to the fullest potential.

According to Bloomberg, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the way for the first drug based on ketamine, from Johnson & Johnson, to gain approval as soon as March 2019. The ketamine variant, called esketamine, may very well become the first-ever rapid-acting antidepressant for suicidal patients and “treatment-resistant depression”. While physicians are still unsure about the long term effects of the drug and more trials need to be conducted in order to get to the root of its effectiveness, many doctors think esketamine may be “the biggest breakthrough in depression treatment since Prozac”.

The long-form story published in Bloomberg tells the stories of multiple people who have benefited from ketamine treatment and how the rapid development of this new miracle drug is being used to combat the skyrocketing rate of suicide in the United States (up 33 per cent in the last 20 years).

The drug esketamine provides “a quick molecular reset button for brains impaired by stress or depression”. Initially developed as an intravenous drug, Johnson & Johnson has developed a nasal solution that has the same effect. The initial study of the drug involved 68 people at high risk that were all antidepressants and other treatment – no placebos were used on actively suicidal patients. Of those who were given esketamine, 40 per cent were deemed “no longer at risk of killing themselves within 24 hours”.

As physicians and investors race to find out more about this supposed miracle drug, concerns remain that a new abuse crisis – similar to that of the current opioid crisis – may arise following federal approval of the substance.

Check out the captivating story behind these successful studies here

Learn more about ketamine’s colorful clubland history here.

Find out how we survived an unconventional, silly, hilarious and definitely brilliant musical about ketamine here.

Ketamine Treatment Provider | 703-844-0184 | NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | 22101 | Loudon County, Va | BDNF and VEGF and Ketamine : Depression Treatment | Depression and PTSD Treatment with Ketamine Therapy | Nose spray ketamine center | CBD Doctor | Arlington, Va |

Call NOVA Health Recovery | 703-844-0184 for a consultation to receive Ketamine for your pain or mood disorder. Alexandria, Va 22306

or click here: NOVA Health recovery

BDNF-VEGF interplay key to rapid antidepressant actions A study in Biological Psychiatry investigates the mechanisms of fast-acting antidepressants E-MAIL

Philadelphia, January 31, 2019 — A study by researchers at Yale University reveals a complex interplay of two different growth factors in the rapid and long-lasting antidepressant effects of ketamine. The study, published in Biological Psychiatry, reports that the antidepressant-like actions of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) require the release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

“Surprisingly, the reciprocal relationship was also observed, indicating that BDNF-VEGF interdependence plays a crucial role in the actions of rapid-acting antidepressants,” said senior author Ronald Duman, PhD.

Ketamine requires the release of both BDNF and VEGF to produce its rapid antidepressant effects, but the connection between the two growth factors–which have different functions and act through different mechanisms–was unknown.

Using mice to model behaviors of depression, the researchers investigated the interaction of BDNF and VEGF. Administering BDNF or VEGF to a brain region implicated in depression, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), produces rapid and long-lasting antidepressant-like actions similar to those of ketamine. In the study, Dr. Duman and colleagues found that removing VEGF from the mPFC prevented the antidepressant-like effects of BDNF in mice. When they performed similar experiments but instead blocked BDNF, the antidepressant-like effects of VEGF were prevented.

Deeper analysis using neuron cultures to examine how the two factors depend on each other revealed that BDNF signaling stimulates VEGF release in neurons and requires VEGF to produce its neurotrophic effects. Conversely, VEGF stimulates the release of BDNF and requires BDNF signaling to produce its neurotrophic effects.

“This observation may have important clinical implications. VEGF inhibitors are widely used to treat various cancers and can be associated with increased risk for depression and cognitive impairments sometimes called the ‘fog of chemotherapy’.

“Since most antidepressant effects are mediated by BDNF, and therefore VEGF, how should we treat these forms of depression and cognitive impairments? The answer to this question may draw us to BDNF-independent effects of antidepressants and new insights into the biology and treatment of depression,” said John Krystal, MD, Editor of Biological Psychiatry.

The results provide the first evidence that reciprocal interdependence of BDNF and VEGF plays a crucial role in their rapid antidepressant-like effects, revealing key mechanisms of ketamine, which requires both BDNF and VEGF. The findings also highlight avenues of research to better understand how each of the factors may affect a person’s risk of depression or their response to antidepressant drugs.

Neurotrophic and Antidepressant Actions of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Require Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor  < Article

Major depressive disorder is a widespread debilitating illness, affecting approximately 17% of the population in the United States and causing enormous personal and socioeconomic burden (12) . Conventional antidepressants, notably monoamine reuptake inhibitors, take weeks to months to produce a therapeutic response and have limited efficacy, as approximately one third of patients with depression fail to respond to typical antidepressants and are considered treatment resistant (3) . Recent studies demonstrate that a single subanesthetic dose of ketamine, an N -methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, produces rapid (within hours) and sustained (up to a week) antidepressant actions even in patients with treatment-resistant depression(45) ; similar rapid and long-lasting effects are observed in rodent models (67) .

Although the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder and the therapeutic actions of ketamine remain unclear, growing evidence supports a neurotrophic hypothesis of depression and antidepressant response 8910 . This hypothesis is based on evidence that reduced neurotrophic factor levels, notably brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and/or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), are tightly linked with neuronal atrophy in brain regions implicated in major depressive disorder, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus 8910 . BDNF and VEGF are two completely different pleiotropic growth factors that bind to and activate different tyrosine kinase receptors, neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (TRKB) and fetal liver kinase 1 (FLK1) (also known as VEGF receptor 2), respectively, that have unique as well as overlapping signaling pathways 111213 . In support of this hypothesis, neuroimaging studies have consistently reported decreased volume of the PFC and hippocampus in patients with depression (1415) ; neuronal atrophy and glial loss have also been reported in postmortem studies of depressive subjects and rodent chronic stress models (1016) . Postmortem studies of subjects with depression and studies of rodent chronic stress also report decreased levels of BDNF and VEGF, as well as their receptors, TRKB and FLK1, respectively, in the PFC and hippocampus(91718192021 ; the VEGF level is also decreased in the cerebrospinal fluid of persons who had attempted suicide (22) .

Conversely, preclinical studies reveal that ketamine and other rapid-acting antidepressants act at least in part by producing the opposite effects, increasing BDNF and/or VEGF release and signaling in the PFC and hippocampus (1023242526 . Ketamine blockade of NMDARs located on gamma-aminobutyric acidergic interneurons leads to disinhibition and a rapid and transient glutamate burst that activates postsynaptic alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors, resulting in stimulation of calcium ion (Ca 2+ ) influx through voltage-dependent calcium channels that activates BDNF release (10) ; this increases and reverses the synaptic deficits in the PFC caused by chronic stress (67) , and it is required for the antidepressant-like behavioral actions of ketamine (2327) . The actions of conventional antidepressants are also linked to BDNF and VEGF, although these monoaminergic agents increase trophic factor levels only after long-term treatment and increase only expression but not release of BDNF and VEGF (928293031323334 .

We have recently reported that neuronal VEGF-FLK1 signaling in the medial PFC (mPFC) is also required for the neurotrophic and antidepressant-like behavioral actions of ketamine (24) . Since BDNF is reported to stimulate VEGF expression and release in neuroblastoma cells (35) , we hypothesized that VEGF signaling acts downstream of BDNF to produce the neurotrophic and antidepressant-like actions. The current study addresses this hypothesis as well as the interdependence between BDNF and VEGF signaling.

Discussion

The current results demonstrate several important points. First, a single intra-mPFC infusion of BDNF produces rapid and sustained antidepressant-like actions similar to those of ketamine and intra-mPFC VEGF infusion, consistent with our recent findings (2438) . Second, the antidepressant-like actions of BDNF in three different behavioral paradigms require neuronal-derived extracellular VEGF. Third, BDNF-TRKB signaling stimulates VEGF release in primary cortical neurons, consistent with a previous report showing BDNF-induced VEGF release in a neuroblastoma cell line (35) . Fourth, BDNF-induced neurotrophic actions on dendrite complexity require VEGF-FLK1 signaling in primary cortical neurons. Fifth, the results also demonstrate a reciprocal interdependence, showing that the antidepressant-like and neurotrophic actions of VEGF require BDNF and that VEGF stimulates BDNF release in primary cortical neurons. These results provide the first evidence of a crucial role for interplay between BDNF and VEGF signaling in the neurotrophic and rapid and/or sustained antidepressant-like responses of these factors. Because these studies were conducted in male mice, further studies are needed to determine whether similar effects are observed in female mice.

Previous studies showed that the rapid antidepressant-like actions of ketamine are blocked by the infusion of a BDNF nAb into the mPFC (23) and are blocked in mice with a knockin of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (valine at position 66 replaced by methionine), which blocks activity-dependent BDNF release (27) . The behavioral actions of two other rapid-acting antidepressants, rapastinel (an NMDAR modulator) and scopolamine (a nonselective muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist), are also blocked by intra-mPFC infusion of a BDNF nAb and are blocked in Val66Met knockin mice (3846) . These effects differ from those of typical monoaminergic antidepressants, which increase the expression but not the release of BDNF, and they indicate that BDNF release accounts for the rapid actions of ketamine and other rapid-acting agents (910) . In addition, we have recently demonstrated that VEGF release in the mPFC is also required for the rapid antidepressant-like actions of ketamine (24) .

The results of the current study demonstrate that infusion of a VEGF nAb into the mPFC is sufficient to block the antidepressant-like effects of BDNF. The dependence on VEGF was observed in three different antidepressant behavioral paradigms, including models of behavioral despair (FST), motivation and reward (FUST), and anxiety (NSF). While future studies will be needed to test this BDNF–VEGF interaction in chronic stress models, such as chronic unpredictable stress or social defeat (747) , the current results indicate a broad effect across these different behavioral paradigms. Together, the results demonstrate that the antidepressant-like behavioral actions of BDNF are dependent on release of VEGF from excitatory neurons in the mPFC. The results of immunoblot analysis demonstrate that the VEGF nAb does not cross-react with recombinant BDNF, but further studies are needed to demonstrate the lack of cross-reactivity under physiological conditions. In any case, the results of the nAb approach were confirmed with an independent approach, neuronal deletion of VEGF ( CaMKIIα-Crerecombinase line crossed with a Vegfa flox/flox ) (24) . Here we show that the antidepressant-like behavioral actions of BDNF in all three behavioral paradigms are also blocked in the neuronal VEGF–deletion mutants. Since VEGF is expressed by multiple cell types, including neurons, astrocytes, and endothelial cells (33) , we cannot rule out the possibility that VEGF derived from one or more of the other cell types contributes to the BDNF response. However, the results indicate an essential role for VEGF derived from neurons.

Analysis of VEGF release in vivo is technically difficult, so we utilized a primary cortical neuron cell culture system to demonstrate that ketamine stimulates BDNF release (2334) . Here we show that incubation with BDNF increases the release of VEGF in primary cortical neurons, and that coincubation with a selective TRKB inhibitor blocks both BDNF-induced and basal VEGF release. The mechanisms underlying BDNF-TRKB–stimulated VEGF release are unclear, but they could involve effects on neuronal activity or signaling pathways linked with neurotrophic factor release. Evidence for an activity-dependent mechanism is provided by previous studies reporting that infusion of BDNF into the mPFC (48) or hippocampus induces c-Fos expression (49) . Induction of c-Fos is coupled with neuronal activity, although stimulation of intracellular signaling pathways independent of neuronal activity can also increase this immediate early gene. More direct evidence is provided by electrophysiological studies demonstrating that BDNF potentiates glutamatergic transmission by increasing the probability of presynaptic release in hippocampal primary neurons or slices 50515253 and in visual cortex slices(54) . BDNF stimulates the release of Ca 2+ from intracellular stores via activation of phospholipase Cγ (13) , which could stimulate VEGF release ( Figure 6 ). These findings are consistent with the possibility that BDNF-enhancement of glutamatergic transmission stimulates activity-dependent VEGF release. There is also evidence that BDNF stimulates VEGF expression and release via the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 pathway and induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in a neuroblastoma cell line (35) . These reports raise the possibility that activity-dependent, as well as intracellular, signaling could be involved in VEGF release, and further studies are needed to determine the exact pathways. 

Figure 6

Ketamine rapidly increases the number and function of spine synapses on layer V pyramidal neurons in the mPFC, and these synaptic effects require activity-dependent BDNF and VEGF release (6102427) . Similar to ketamine, rapastinel and scopolamine also increase the number and function of spine synapses in the mPFC (38465556) . All of these rapid-acting antidepressants produce neurotrophic actions in primary cortical neurons, including increased BDNF release and increased dendrite complexity (23243446) . We have also reported that ketamine, as well as VEGF induction of dendrite complexity, is completely blocked by a selective FLK1 inhibitor(24) . The current study demonstrates that BDNF increases dendrite complexity in primary neurons and that these neurotrophic effects are completely blocked by incubation with a selective FLK1 inhibitor. These findings provide further evidence that VEGF is required for the neurotrophic actions of BDNF on dendrite complexity.

The results clearly demonstrate a requirement for VEGF in the antidepressant-like and neurotrophic actions of BDNF, but we also examined reciprocal interactions between these two factors. Somewhat surprisingly, we found that the antidepressant-like and neurotrophic effects of VEGF required BDNF release and TRKB signaling. Using similar experimental approaches, the results show that coinfusion of a BDNF nAb into the mPFC blocks the antidepressant-like behavioral responses of VEGF in the three behavioral paradigms tested. The neutralizing antibody used for these studies was specific to BDNF as there was no cross-reactivity with VEGF examined by immunoblot analysis. We also found that incubation of primary cortical neurons with VEGF stimulates the release of BDNF into the culture media, and that this effect is blocked by a selective FLK1 antagonist. In addition, the results show that VEGF stimulation of dendrite complexity is blocked by incubation with a selective TRKB receptor antagonist. The mechanisms underlying VEGF stimulation of BDNF release are unclear but could also involve activity-dependent effects. VEGF increases presynaptic glutamate release probability, leading to enhanced glutamatergic transmission in primary hippocampal slices (57) , and it also increases excitatory transmission via postsynaptic NMDARs (58) . VEGF also stimulates the release of Ca 2+ from intracellular stores via activation of phospholipase Cγ (11) , which could stimulate BDNF release ( Figure 6 ).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the current results in combination with our recent findings (232427343846) demonstrate a key interdependence between BDNF and VEGF signaling in the mPFC and suggest that this reciprocal dependence plays a crucial role in the neurotrophic and antidepressant-like effects of rapid-acting antidepressants. This is particularly clear for the antidepressant-like actions of ketamine, which are blocked by inhibition of either BDNF or VEGF (232427) . Although the requirement for VEGF in the actions of other agents, notably rapastinel and scopolamine, have not been tested and the role of VEGF in patients with depression remains unclear, the prediction is that there is also a requirement for VEGF. These findings raise several interesting possibilities regarding the consequences of this interdependence. For example, previous studies demonstrate that deletion of either BDNF or VEGF in mice is insufficient to produce depressive behaviors, possibly because of the antidepressant-like and neurotrophic actions of the remaining factor (242728) , and it would be interesting to determine whether dual-deletion mutants display depressive-like behaviors. A related consequence is whether a functional polymorphism of one factor would increase vulnerability but is insufficient alone to produce depression, which appears to be the case for the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (275960) . In contrast, the antidepressant actions of ketamine and other rapid-acting agents could be attenuated by a functional polymorphism of one factor, as reported for the ketamine response in carriers of the BDNF Met allele (27384661) , although this effect also appears to be race specific (62) . The present results provide new insights on the complex interdependence of these two critical neurotrophic factors that could have important consequences for understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of depression.

____________________________________________________________________

Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment resistant depression

The VAL66MET polymporphism may predict response to Ketamine and suggest additional therapies to add on to those who do not respond:

Our results suggest that MDD patients with the Val/Val BDNF allele at rs6265 are more likely to exhibit increased antidepressant response to ketamine than Met carriers. Liu and colleagues
(8) alluded to the possibility that the weakened antidepressant response to ketamine infusion typically seen in approximately
30% of patients might be related to the Val66Met polymorphism. Our finding is consistent with their hypothesis that rs6265 genotypes could help separate ketamine responders from nonresponders. They also suggested that it may be possible to administer BDNF-enhancing compounds to Met allele-carrying patients before administering ketamine. Standard antidepressants, electroconvulsive therapy, and brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation all increase BDNF levels (11,12); exercise also has BDNF secretion-enhancing effects (13).
In contrast, a previous report that included the large STAR*D cohort found no association between traditional antidepressants and rs6265 (14). This suggests that the Val66Met variant
may play a different role in patients treated with traditional antidepressants as opposed to those treated with rapid-acting antidepressants such as ketamine.

Genetic Variant BDNF (Val66Met) Polymorphism Alters Anxiety-Related Behavior A common single-nucleotide polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene,
a methionine (Met) substitution for valine (Val) at codon 66 (Val66Met), is associated with
alterations in brain anatomy and memory, but its relevance to clinical disorders is unclear. We
generated a variant BDNF mouse (BDNFMet/Met) that reproduces the phenotypic hallmarks in
humans with the variant allele. BDNFMet was expressed in brain at normal levels, but its secretion
from neurons was defective. When placed in stressful settings, BDNFMet/Met mice exhibited increased
anxiety-related behaviors that were not normalized by the antidepressant, fluoxetine. A variant
BDNF may thus play a key role in genetic predispositions to anxiety and depressive disorders.Human Biomarkers of Rapid Antidepressant EffectsMood disorders such as major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder—and their consequent effects on the individual and
society—are among the most disabling and costly of all medical illnesses. Although a number of antidepressant treatments are available
in clinical practice, many patients still undergo multiple and lengthy medication trials before experiencing relief of symptoms. Therefore
a tremendous need exists to improve current treatment options and to facilitate more rapid, successful treatment in patients suffering
from the deleterious neurobiological effects of ongoing depression. Toward that end, ongoing research is exploring the identification of
biomarkers that might be involved in prevention, diagnosis, treatment response, severity, or prognosis of depression. Biomarkers
evaluating treatment response will be the focus of this review, given the importance of providing relief to patients in a more expedient
and systematic manner. A novel approach to developing such biomarkers of response would incorporate interventions with a rapid
onset of action—such as sleep deprivation or intravenous drugs (e.g., ketamine or scopolamine). This alternative translational model for
new treatments in psychiatry would facilitate shorter studies, improve feasibility, and increase higher compound throughput testing for
these devastating disorders.________________________________________________________________________Predictors of Response to Ketamine in Treatment Resistant Depression and Bipolar DisorderAbstract: Objectives: Extant evidence indicates that ketamine exerts rapid antidepressant effects
in treatment-resistant depressive (TRD) symptoms as a part of major depressive disorder (MDD)
and bipolar disorder (BD). The identification of depressed sub-populations that are more likely
to benefit from ketamine treatment remains a priority. In keeping with this view, the present
narrative review aims to identify the pretreatment predictors of response to ketamine in TRD as
part of MDD and BD. Method: Electronic search engines PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov,
and Scopus were searched for relevant articles from inception to January 2018. The search term
ketamine was cross-referenced with the terms depression, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder,
predictors, and response and/or remission. Results: Multiple baseline pretreatment predictors of
response were identified, including clinical (i.e., Body Mass Index (BMI), history of suicide, family
history of alcohol use disorder), peripheral biochemistry (i.e., adiponectin levels, vitamin B12 levels),
polysomnography (abnormalities in delta sleep ratio), neurochemistry (i.e., glutamine/glutamate
ratio), neuroimaging (i.e., anterior cingulate cortex activity), genetic variation (i.e., Val66Met BDNF
allele), and cognitive functioning (i.e., processing speed). High BMI and a positive family history of
alcohol use disorder were the most replicated predictors. Conclusions: A pheno-biotype of depression
more, or less likely, to benefit with ketamine treatment is far from complete. Notwithstanding,
metabolic-inflammatory alterations are emerging as possible pretreatment response predictors
of depressive symptom improvement, most notably being cognitive impairment. Sophisticated
data-driven computational methods that are iterative and agnostic are more likely to provide
actionable baseline pretreatment predictive information.In addition to pretreatment pro-inflammatory cytokines potentially moderating response to
ketamine, preliminary evidence indicates that circulating vitamin B12 levels may affect the treatment
outcomes with ketamine [34]. Previous reports indicate that higher levels of circulating vitamin B12
are associated with a greater probability of response to conventional antidepressants [35].To contextualize the foregoing results, a single small study with 20 subjects identified vitamin
B12 levels were cross-sectionally associated with bipolar depression. Specifically, ketamine treatment
“responders” had higher levels of circulating vitamin B12 when compared to “non-responders”,
where “responders” were subjects with a 50% or greater reduction of HDRS, as compared to baseline,
on the seventh day after infusion. This result is consistent with studies showing that higher levels of
vitamin B12 are positively correlated with the conventional antidepressant response [21,35].3.5. Neurochemistry Variables
Abnormalities in amino acid neurotransmitter systems are postulated to play a critical role in the
pathoetiology of MDD [38]. Stress-induced depression and cognitive impairment have been found
to be associated with the reduced expression of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors in
the brain [39].
Using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), Salvadore et al. (2012) measured levels
of the amino acid neurotransmitters gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate, and Glx/glutamate
(a surrogate marker of glutamine), in the ventromedial and the dorsomedial/dorsal anterolateral
prefrontal cortex before and after IV ketamine treatment in subjects with MDD (n = 14). Following
ketamine infusion, depressive symptoms significantly improved after 230 min, as assessed by the
changes in the mean MADRS score. The authors reported that while pretreatment GABA and glutamate
did not correlate with an improvement of depressive symptoms, pretreatment Glx/glutamate
ratio was found to be significantly and inversely correlated with the symptomatic improvement
with ketamine [23].

Symptomatology and predictors of antidepressant efficacy in extended responders to a single ketamine infusionSymptomatology and predictors of antidepressant efficacy in extended responders to a single ketamine infusion

Highlights


  • Some subjects display antidepressant response to ketamine two weeks post-infusion.

  • Two-week post-infusion data from multiple ketamine trials (MDD & BD) were combined.

  • Smoking history & family history of alcohol use were linked to response at two weeks.

  • Less sadness, anhedonia & trouble concentrating at day 1 predicted greater response.

  • Sleep quality was not significantly improved in responders at two weeks.
  • ________________________________________________________________________________________

rs6265 – Val66Met – the Ketamine SNP   < LINK

rs6265, also known as Val66Met, is a SNP in brain-derived neurotrophic factor BDNF gene. The more common G allele encodes the Val, while the A allele encodes Met.

The A allele may also be protective against depression when subjected to repeated defeat [PMID 17956738g2b2mh blog

OA-icon.png

On a driving-based motor learning task subjects with this genotype showed greater error during short-term learning and poorer retention over 4 days, relative to subjects without the polymorphism. The presence of this BDNF polymorphism is associated with differences in brain motor system function, altered short-term plasticity, and greater error in short-term motor learning. [PMID 19745020]

A 2017 study of 1,000 Alzheimer’s disease patients, a third of whom were rs6265(A) carriers, concluded that over the ~7 year study such carriers lost memory and thinking skills somewhat more rapidly than non-carriers.10.​1212/​WNL.​0000000000003980

_____________________________________________________________________

Of interest regarding this SNP:

DON’T TELL GEICO: YOU MAY BE A NATURAL BORN BAD DRIVER

Next time you get cut off by a another driver, consider giving the offender a break: One-third of Americans might be genetically predisposed to crappy driving.

No, really, it’s not just your imagination.

In a new study of college undergraduates, those with a common genetic variation scored 20 percent worse in a driving simulator than their counterparts.

“The people who had this genetic variation performed more poorly from the get-go and learned more slowly as they went along,” said Steven Cramer, a University of California, Irvine neurologist, who works on helping stroke victims recover. “Then, when we brought them back four days later, they had more forgetting.”

The single nucleotide polymorphism, or SNP, is just one of millions of single-letter variations between humans’ genetic codes. This one occurs in a gene that produces a protein called brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which helps regulate the formation of new synapses, and the maintenance of old ones. BDNF plays a very important role in what’s called neuroplasticity, or the brain’s ability to rewire itself on the fly.

As described in a paper published in the journal Cerebral Cortex, study participants were asked to drive 16 laps in a driving simulator that was essentially a screen with a steering wheel. As they drove around the course, they attempted to keep their cars on a black strip in the center of the road. The software grades their ability to complete that task quantitatively. And, of a small sample of 29 students, people with that single genetic difference, called Val66Met, performed more poorly than their demographically similar counterparts.

“It’s a very nice study, well designed, and the questions they ask are good,” said Clifford Nass, a co-founder of Stanford’s CarLab, an interdisciplinary research institute. He was not part of the study.

Cramer considers the simulation a good proxy not just for driving, but for other complex motor skills tasks. Because it’s not controlling a motor vehicle, per se, that he’s interested in, but how the brain learns, or relearns complex tasks.

When people have a stroke, and a portion of their brain dies, they have to relearn tasks using different parts of their brains. Individual genes are only part of the symphony of influences that determine individual behavior, but the Val66Met variation appears to have an unusually strong influence on the brain’s activity.

“There is mounting evidence that the one in three people who have this variation have less plasticity than the two-thirds of people who lack that genetic variation,” Cramer said.

Results from a separate study reported earlier this year in Scientific American also found that genetic variation in BDNF helped determined people’s skill at a simple computer game.

The effect is so pronounced, in fact, that Cramer said he could imagine future stroke patient routing within hospitals based on the SNP.

“I wonder if there aren’t going to be treatments, when they have traumatic brain injury and you’re in the rehab ward, where they test the gene and say, ‘Send them to the BDNF ward,'” he said.

So, if the presence of the gene makes you a worse driver, a slower stroke-victim recoverer and possibly has other negative effects, why is the variant still present?

“Variations can stick around just for the fact that they are not that bad for you,” said Bruce Teter, a geneticist who studies the brain at UCLA. “They don’t kill you before you reproduce, in which case, there is no selective advantage or disadvantage.”

But it also turns out that people with the Val66Met variant could be less susceptible to degenerative neurological disorders like Parkinson’s and Huntington’s.

“Originally people thought plasticity had to be good, as it’s related to the ability of the brain to adapt and learn and things like that,” Teter said. “But neuroplasticity can also be bad for you in situations where the kinds of changes that are seen are deleterious.”

But if you want to stay out of car accidents, it’s better to have the dominant BDNF variant, Cramer’s study suggests. And if further work continues to support that idea, the question is, can or should we do anything with that information?

“Let’s pretend that the one in three people are more prone to car accidents,” Cramer said. “It’s up to society to say, how do we deal with that fact?”

SNPwatch: The Bad Driving Gene?

New research suggests that your skills behind the wheel may be affected by your genes.

To better understand the effects of a variant in the BDNF gene on motor skills learning, Steven Cramer and colleagues at UC Irvine tested 29 subjects in a driving simulator. Their results, published in the journal Cerebral Cortex, might make you think twice about whom you go on your next road trip with.

Subjects sat in front of a screen with their hands firmly planted at “10 and 2” on a steering wheel and guided their “car” around a track, attempting to stay centered over a black line. The steering was tuned so that subjects had to begin turning before the screen actually changed.

Over the course of 15 trials, all of the study subjects got better at the driving task. But the seven people who had a T improved less than those with two Cs. When subjects returned to the lab four days later for a final lap, everyone had forgotten how to drive the simulator a little bit, but those with a T did worse.

“These people [with a T at ] make more errors from the get-go, and they forget more of what they learned after time away,” Cramer said in a press release.

The BDNF protein helps to regulate how nerve cells make new connections and maintain old ones. The T version of the variant, also known as the Val66Met, reduces the amount of BDNF available in the brain and has been linked to impaired learning and memory. Studies have shown that stroke victims with this variant don’t recover as well as those who lack it.

But there may be an upside: the variant seems to have a beneficial effect on cognition in people with Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, lupus and multiple sclerosis.

“It’s as if nature is trying to determine the best approach,” Cramer said. “If you want to learn a new skill or have had a stroke and need to regenerate brain cells, there’s evidence that having the variant is not good. But if you’ve got a disease that affects cognitive function, there’s evidence it can act in your favor. The variant brings a different balance between flexibility and stability.”

Can nurture save you from your own genes? Genes, environment and depression

Welcome to Mind Matterswhere top researchers in neuroscience, psychology, and psychiatry explain and discuss the findings and theories driving their fields. Readers can join them. We hope you will. This week: Genes, Environment, and Depression:How Nurture Can Save You from Your Own Genes _____________________ Introductionby David DobbsEditor, Mind MattersAmong biology’s more riveting inquiries is the investigation of gene-environment interactions — the demonstration that a person’s genes constantly react to experience in a way that changes behavior, which in turn shapes environment, which in turn alters gene expression and so on. As David Olds described a few weeks ago, this new subdiscipline is yielding startling insights about how nature and nurture mix to help determine one’s health and character. This week reviewer Charles Glatt reviews a study that takes this investigation a level deeper, examining how two different gene variants show their power — or not — depending on whether a child is abused, nurtured, or both. As Glatt describes, this study, despite its grim subject, suggests promising things about the power of nurture to magnify nature’s gifts or lift its burdens. _____________________ Gene-Environment Interactions:When Nurture Wears a White Hat Charles GlattWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY For centuries, philosophers, theologians and biologists have debated the relative roles of inborn traits versus environmentally defined experiences in determining what and who we are. This nature-nurture debate carries fundamental implications for our understanding of self-determination, or free will. Indeed, as research has begun to identify genetic risk factors for certain behavioral traits, these risk factors have already been used in court (see here and here)to argue that punishment should be lessened for convicted felons — the presumption being that their genes made them inherently more likely to misbehave.The importance and challenge of the nature-nurture debate in behavior has recently spawned a new area of research that looks at the interaction between genetic risk factors and experience in the development of psychopathology. A study led by Joan Kaufman and Joel Gelernter, both of Yale, and published in Biological Psychiatry, has demonstrated what many of us have intuitively concluded, which is that both nature and nurture contribute to who we are. In this particular study, genetic and environmental factors interact to determine risk for depression. In their study, “Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor-5-HTTLPR Gene Interactions and Environmental Modifiers of Depression in Children,” Kaufman, Gelernter and colleagues found distinct gene-environment interactions in the risk for depressive symptoms. Other studies have found similar interactions, but looked mainly at interactions between single genetic and single environmental risk factors. This study ups the ante by examining various interactions among two genetic and two environmental factors, including a four-way interaction with two genetic and two environmental variables. Where the Money Is Kaufman and colleagues took the approach of bank robber Willie Sutton who, when asked why he robbed banks, is said to have replied, “Because that’s where the money is.” Kaufman and colleagues focused on the most well known and accepted genetic and environmental risk factors for depression to see how they interacted with one another to alter risk. On the nature side, they focused on polymorphisms — genetic differences between individuals — that have been implicated in depression through a variety of methods. The first polymorphism is in the regulatory region of the gene for the serotonin transporter. This polymorphism is the 5-HTTLPR, which stands for the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) transporter linked polymorphism. The 5-HTTLPR has received much research attention because it appears to alter the expression of the serotonin transporter molecule, which is the target of the commonly prescribed serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class of antidepressants and is itself implicated in depression. Caspi and Moffit and other research groups have repeatedly found this polymorphism to be associated with depression in the presence of stressful life events. The second polymorphism Kaufman studied is the gene for brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or BDNF. BDNF is a molecule that seems to encourage the growth of new neurons; it appears to be central to brain growth and learning. This polymorphism in the BNDF gene alters the efficiency of secretion of this molecule. Recent studies in animals and humans have shown that BDNF levels are decreased during stress and depression and that SSRIs act at least in part by normalizing the levels of BDNF. (BNDF levels have been shown to rise in response to successful SSRI treatment, as well as in response to successful psychotherapy and, for that matter, exercise. An earlier Mind Matters by Francis Lee and Larry Tecott reviewed a rare paper finding a downside to BNDF. ) Thus it is not hard to imagine that polymorphisms (that is, certain variants) of the BDNF gene might interact with other factors to contribute to depression risk. BNDF and 5-HTTLPR, then, were the “nature” factors Kaufman and colleagues examined. From the “nurture,” or environment/experience, side they added two epidemiologically established modifiers of risk for depression — childhood abuse/maltreatment on one hand and, on the other, positive social support.Please Interact Amongst Yourselves The researchers studied 109 children who had been removed from their parents’ care due to reports of abuse or neglect and 87 control children with no reports of abuse or maltreatment. They scored all the children for depressive symptoms such as irritability, crying and reluctance to see friends. High scores on this scale indicate greater depression. They then compared the distribution of these scores in children with different combinations of the 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms described above. They found that children with the “bad” form of 5-HTTLPR had higher depressive symptom scores — but only if they had a history of maltreatment. Bad 5-HTTLPR made it more likely (but not certain) that an abused child would develop depression. But it created no effect on depression scores in children without a history of maltreatment. It was like a seed that had to be watered by abuse. This replicates similar findings in studies by Caspi and Moffit and other groups. Kaufman and colleagues then looked at how the different forms of BDNF might affect this picture. They found that a certain version (or allele) of the BDNF gene amplified the effects of the 5-HTTLPR gene, making it even more likely that a given child would develop depression — but again, only if the child had suffered abuse. Finally, Kaufman and colleagues looked at the effects of social support. They asked the children about people in their lives whom they could talk to about personal things, count on to buy them things they needed and other, similar signs of supportive relationships, and from the answers derived a social support score. Children were then characterized as having high or low support. The researchers found that high levels of such nurturing counteracted the effects of the genetic risk factors almost completely.Balance of Power As with any behavioral genetic study, one must be careful not to overinterpret these findings, because virtually no study in behavioral genetics is consistently or completely replicated. Nonetheless, some additional points about this paper can help inform us on the nature-nurture debate. First, depression scores and categorical diagnoses of depression were significantly higher in children with a history of maltreatment versus controls even before any genetic analysis was factored in. In a similar vein, the highest average depression score of any genotype category in the unabused control children was lower than the average depression score for any genotype category in the maltreated children; genes alone weren’t likely to make the child depressed, but maltreatment alone could. These findings suggest that, at least regarding these specific polymorphisms, nurture beats nature. This conclusion will come as a relief to believers in human free will. It also argues strongly for the identification of children at risk for maltreatment and strong actions to reverse the negative effects of this experience.

Oral Scopolamine Augmentation in Moderate to Severe Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Objective:To evaluate the antidepressant effect of oral scopolamine as an adjunct to citalopram.

Method:In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, patients were assessed in the outpatient clinics of 2 large hospitals from November 2011 to January 2012. Forty patients (18–55 years) with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV-TR criteria) and 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≥22 were randomly assigned to scopolamine hydrobromide (1 mg/d) (n=20) or placebo (n=20) in addition to citalopram for 6 weeks. HDRS score was measured at baseline and days 4, 7, 14, 28, and 42. The primary outcome measure was HDRS score change from baseline to week 6 in the scopolamine group versus the placebo group. Response was defined as ≥50% decrease in HDRS score; remission, as HDRS score ≤7.

Results: Augmentation with scopolamine was significantly more effective than placebo (F1,38=5.831, P=.021). Patients receiving scopolamine showed higher rates of response (65%, 13/20 at week 4) and remission (65%, 13/20 at week 6) than the placebo group (30%, 6/20 and 20%, 4/20, respectively; P=.027, P=.004, respectively). Patients in the scopolamine group showed higher rates of dry mouth, blurred vision, and dizziness than the placebo group.

Conclusions: Oral scopolamine is a safe and effective adjunct for treatment of patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder.

Exploratory genome-wide association analysis of response to ketamine and a polygenic analysis of response to scopolamine in depression.

Antidepressant effects of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine a review.

Pulsed Intravenous Administration of Scopolamine Produces Rapid Antidepressant Effects and Modest Side Effects

SNP watch link

Ketamine Doctor | 703-844-0184 | Fairfax, Va 22304 | A Vaccine for Depression? Ketamine | Arlington, Va 20176 | 703-844-0184 | NOVA Health Recovery Ketamine Treatment Center for depression | 22101 | CBD center | THC Center | Virginia Ketamine Provider | Northern Virginia Ketamine Center | 703-844-0184

NOVA Health Recovery Ketamine Treatment Center | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call to schedule an intranasal ketamine prescription or Ketamine Treatment for  depression, PTSD |

NOVA HEalth Recovery Website

A Vaccine for Depression?

Ketamine’s remarkable effect bolsters a new theory of mental illness.

A Vaccine for Depression?

Ketamine’s remarkable effect bolsters a new theory of mental illness.

B

One sunny day this fall, I caught a glimpse of the new psychiatry. At a mental hospital near Yale University, a depressed patient was being injected with ketamine. For 40 minutes, the drug flowed into her arm, bound for cells in her brain. If it acts as expected, ketamine will become the first drug to quickly stop suicidal drive, with the potential to save many lives. Other studies of ketamine are evaluating its effect as a vaccination against depression and post-traumatic stress. Between them, the goal is nothing less than to redefine our understanding of mental illness itself.

Depression is the most common mental illness in the United States, affecting 30 percent of Americans at some point in their lives. But despite half a century of research, ubiquitous advertising, and blockbuster sales, antidepressant drugs just don’t work very well. They treat depression as if it were caused by a chemical imbalance: Pump in more of one key ingredient, or sop up another, and you will have fixed the problem.

Beck_BR-2
PREPARED: One day, soldiers heading into combat could be treated to reduce the chance of getting PTSD.Co Rentmeester/Getty Images

But the correspondence between these chemicals (like serotonin) and depression is relatively weak. An emerging competitive theory, inspired in part by ketamine’s effectiveness, has it that psychiatric disease is less about chemical imbalance than structural changes in the brain—and that a main cause of these changes is psychological stress. “I really do think stress is to mental illness as cigarettes are to heart disease,” says Gerard Sanacora, the psychiatry professor running the ketamine trial at Yale.

The theory describes stress grinding down individual neurons gradually, as storms do roof shingles. This, in turn, changes the nature of their connections to one another and the structure of the brain. Ketamine, along with some similar molecules, acts to strengthen the neuron against that damage, affecting not just the chemistry of the brain but also its structure.

Mental hospitals don’t usually see patients until they break: a brain shaped by vulnerable genes, wrecked by the stress of loss or trauma. This isn’t how it works with other sicknesses: heart disease, cancer, AIDS. Detected early, these conditions can often be managed. Crises averted.

Sapolsky_TH-F1

T

If Sanacora and like-minded researchers are right, we may be on the cusp of a sea change that allows for a similar approach to mental health. The new approaches may prevent mental illness before it hits, by delivering a vaccination for the mind.

The need for progress could hardly be more urgent: Of all illnesses, neuropsychiatric diseases are estimated to put the heaviest burden on society. Nearly half of Americans are affected by some sort of mental disorder at some point in life. Suicides, 90 percent of them among the mentally ill, take 40,000 Americans every year—more than murder or car crashes. Since 2005, the suicide rate among U.S. war veterans has nearly doubled; in the first half of 2012, more service members died by suicide than in combat. Few medical failures are more flagrant than psychiatry’s impotence to save these people.

At the same time, treatment can be woefully ineffective. Less than a third of depression patients respond to a drug within 14 weeks, according to the 2006 STAR*D trial, the largest clinical test of antidepressants. After six months and multiple drugs, only half of patients recovered. Thirty-three percent don’t respond to any drug at all. When the pills do work, they are slow—a deadly risk, given that people with mood disorders kill themselves more often than anyone else.

Our treatments work so poorly in part because we don’t really understand what they do. Serotonin, the most common target for current antidepressants, is a neurotransmitter, a chemical that carries messages in the brain. But it was first found, in 1935, in the gut. Serotonin’s name comes from blood serum, where Cleveland Clinic scientists discovered it in 1948, noting that the chemical helps with clotting.

When Betty Twarog, a 25-year-old Ph.D. student at Harvard, later found serotonin in neurons, she wasn’t taken seriously. At that time, brain signals were thought to be purely electrical impulses that leapt between cells. Twarog called this old idea “sheer intellectual idiocy,” as Gary Greenberg reports in his book Manufacturing Depression. Working at the Cleveland Clinic in 1953, she found serotonin in the brains of rats, dogs, and monkeys.

Beck_BR-4
K: One obstacle to the therapeutic use of ketamine is its reputation as a recreational drug.Wikipedia

Twarog didn’t know yet what serotonin was doing there, but a clue came soon from D.W. Woolley, a biochemist at Rockefeller University, in New York. In 1954 Woolley pointed out in a paper that lysergic acid diethylamide, or LSD, is chemically similar to serotonin and is processed similarly in the brain. Since LSD “calls forth in man mental disturbances resembling those of schizophrenia,” he wrote, another drug affecting serotonin might be used to treat schizophrenia. Twarog’s original paper would take years to percolate through the male-dominated field, but her work and Woolley’s would become accepted as evidence of how important chemicals like serotonin could be to brain signaling. The discovery was a breakthrough for neuroscience—but it also birthed a misleading, long-lived belief about mental illness. “The thesis of this paper,” Woolley wrote, “is that … serotonin has an important role to play in mental processes and that the suppression of its action results in a mental disorder. In other words, it is the lack of serotonin which is the cause of the disorder.”

Around the same time, other researchers stumbled on the first antidepressants, iproniazid and imipramine. Intended to treat tuberculosis and schizophrenia, respectively, these drugs also happened to make some patients “inappropriately happy.” Researchers found that the drugs elevated levels of serotonin, along with related neurotransmitters.1 This began a huge search to find chemically similar drugs that worked better as antidepressants.

Drug companies often say mood disorder is caused by a “chemical imbalance.” But the evidence for this story is slim.

Iproniazid was the first of a class of medicines that block an enzyme from breaking down serotonin, as well as dopamine and norepinephrine, two other neurotransmitters. The chief downside of these drugs, called monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), is that they require a strict diet: no aged cheeses, wine, beer, or cured meats. Combined with these foods, the drugs can cause deadly spikes in blood pressure, a hassle that often inclines patients to ditch them. (The novelist David Foster Wallace took an MAOI for decades; in part to escape the food restrictions, he got off the drug months before his suicide.) On the other hand, tricyclic antidepressants, like imipramine, work by blocking the re-absorption of serotonin and norepinephrine. The cost is a host of side effects, from dry mouth to weight gain to erectile dysfunction and loss of libido.

The next generation of drugs focused on fine-tuning the same mechanisms, and had somewhat improved side effects. A new class of drugs known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, arrived in the ’80s, bringing huge commercial successes like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil. Since SSRIs are more specifically focused on serotonin, they were heralded as cleaner options; but they are not much more effective at lifting mood than the older drugs. We often take for granted the diabetes analogy for depression: If you are depressed, it is because you need serotonin, just as a diabetic person needs insulin. Drug companies often say that mood disorder is caused by a “chemical imbalance” in serotonin or a signal like it. One ad for Zoloft, the blockbuster antidepressant, featured a sad white circle crawling cutely beneath a gray cloud; the voice-over boasted that depression may be “related to an imbalance of natural chemicals in the brain. Zoloft works to correct this imbalance.”

But the evidence for this story is slim. Prozac raises serotonin levels within hours yet doesn’t change mood for weeks. When scientists deplete serotonin in healthy people, it does not make them sad. And when doctors measure serotonin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of depressed people, they do not find a consistent deficiency; one 2008 study even found increased levels of serotonin in depressed people’s brains. The drug tianeptine, discovered in the late ‘80s, decreases serotonin levels yet relieves depression. And studies have shown that people falling in love show lower, not higher, levels of serotonin.

Serotonin is clearly not just a feel-good chemical. If a serotonin-based drug like Zoloft makes you happier, it works in some other, indirect way. As psychiatrist Ronald Pies, editor of Psychiatric Times, put it in 2011, “The ‘chemical imbalance’ notion was always a kind of urban legend—never a theory seriously propounded by well-informed psychiatrists.”

Meanwhile, as serotonin falls far short of explaining depression, a more likely candidate is emerging.

Stress in moderation is not harmful, but motivating. Cortisol, a stress hormone, cycles daily; synchronizing with sunlight, it helps arouse us for the day. In health, the hormone spikes when we need to pay attention: a test, a job interview, a date. Studies on rodents and humans confirm that brief, mild increases in stress are good for the brain, particularly for memory. During these spikes, neurons are born and expand in the hippocampus, the seahorse-shaped finger of tissue responsible for forming new memories and understanding three-dimensional space, and rodents learn better. The student who gets stressed while studying is more alert and remembers more than the one who feels no urgency—up to a point. The problem comes when stress is either too intense at one moment, as in a rape or violent attack, or too sustained, as in long-term poverty, neglect, or abuse.

Beck_BR
ACCENTUATING THE NEGATIVE …: Under prolonged stress, neurons in the amygdala, the brain’s fear center, expand like overgrown shrubbery and become hyperactive.Image from “Nature Reviews Neuroscience”*

Stress changes brain architecture differently, depending on how long it lasts. After chronic stress, like childhood trauma, the effect of hormones on brain cells inverts: Neurons in the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for mood and impulse control, start to shrink, while those in the amygdala, the almond-shaped seat of fear and anxiety, expand like overgrown shrubbery. But people are differently vulnerable, depending on genes and on prior life experience. “If you take two people and subject them to the same stressful event, for one of them it will be harmful and for the other, no,” says Maurizio Popoli, a professor of pharmacology at the University of Milan. “It is because they perceive the stress differently.”

Beck_BR-1
… AND ELIMINATING THE POSITIVE: In the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, regions responsible for memory, attention, and self-control, chronic stress shrinks the branches of neurons.Image from “Nature Reviews Neuroscience”*

Stress hormones’ most important effect is to flood parts of the brain with glutamate, the brain’s “go” signal. Used by 80 percent of neurons in the cortex, this key neurotransmitter drives mental processes from memory to mood. Glutamate triggers neurons to generate sudden bursts of electricity that release more glutamate, which can in turn trigger electrical bursts in nearby neurons.

This cellular signaling is called excitation and is fundamental to how information is processed in the brain. Like sexual excitability, it ebbs and flows; a “refractory period” follows each neural firing, or spike, during which the neuron cannot be excited. Other neurotransmitters, like serotonin, are called “modulatory,” because they change the sensitivity of neurons that secrete glutamate (among others). Less than 1 percent of neurons in the cortex signal with these modulators. As Popoli puts it, these modulators are “very important for fine-tuning the machine. But the machine itself is an excitatory machine,” driven by glutamate.

Glutamate moves like a ship between neurons. The sea it sails is called the synapse, the shore it departs from is the presynaptic neuron, and the destination, on the synapse’s far side, is the postsynaptic neuron. Another component, called a glial cell, works to remove glutamate ships from the synapse and recycle them. The glutamate system is affected at each of these points by stress hormones: They push the first neuron to send more ships, interfere with the glial cell’s recycling, and block the docks on the distant shore. All of these changes increase the number of glutamate ships left in the synapse, flooding the cell with aberrant signals. Indeed, depressed people’s brains, or at least animal models of depression, show all three of these problems, leading to long-lasting excesses of glutamate in key portions of the brain.

This superabundance of glutamate makes a neuron fire sooner than it should and triggers a cascade of signals inside the cell, damaging its structure. Glutamate binds to the neuron and allows in a flood of positively charged particles, including calcium, which are vital to making a neuron fire. But in excess, calcium activates enzymes that break down the neuron. Each neuron has tree-like branches, called dendrites, which are used to communicate with other neurons. When overdosed in glutamate, this canopy of branches shrinks, like a plant doused with herbicide. First the “twigs,” called spines, disappear. After prolonged stress, whole branches recede.

This harmful process, called excitotoxicity, is thought to be involved in bipolar disorder, depression, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s. In depressed brains, many areas are shrunken and underactive, including part of the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus. The brain changes that cause mood disorders, Sanacora and his colleagues believe, come in part from chronic stress overexciting neurons with glutamate.

Ketamine works faster than any other drug, and for up to 65 percent of patients who don’t respond to existing treatments.

We usually think of our brains’ adaptability as a good thing. Just as neurons grow during development, the wiring in the adult brain can change. After strokes or other brain injuries, neural signals re-route themselves around damage, allowing even very old people to re-learn lost skills. Psychotherapy and meditation can change patterns of brain activity in ways that persist after treatment.2

But the neuroplasticity hypothesis of mental disorder highlights the drawback of such neural liberalism: The human brain’s flexibility allows regeneration, but also renders it vulnerable to being altered by stress. Subjected to the trauma of war, a bad breakup, or a bout of homelessness, a person with a genetic predisposition may find his mind stuck in a loop of chronic fear or depression.

The mood drugs in wide use now focus on modulatory neurotransmitters like serotonin. Ketamine, however, works directly on glutamate signaling. If ketamine is tapping into the root of the problem, this might explain why it works faster, better, and more often than more popular antidepressants.

Not everybody accepts the idea that glutamate and stress are central to depression. Some experts see the effects of stress as downstream effects, not the root cause of mood disorder. “The mechanism of action of a good treatment does not have to be the inverse of a disease mechanism,” says Eric Nestler, an expert on addiction and depression at Mt. Sinai Hospital. Serotonin drugs and ketamine may affect depression indirectly, without a serotonin or glutamate abnormality at the root of depression. Nestler also points out that depression probably includes a diversity of subtypes, without any single cause. He treats depression not as a unified disease, but a constellation of symptoms, each with discrete neural roots.

Even so, we do know that ketamine works faster than any other drug, and for up to 65 percent of patients who don’t respond to existing treatments.

If ketamine turns out to be a psychiatric savior, it will be one with a surprising history. Since 1962 it has been a go-to anesthetic for children in emergency rooms, because it kills pain, muffles consciousness, and rarely causes breathing or heart problems. Children given ketamine enter “a trance like state of sensory isolation” free of pain, memory, and awareness, as one review put it. Emergency room doctors rely on ketamine to make sure kids have no awareness or memory of, say, the trauma of having a shattered arm set back into place.

On the other hand, ketamine is a well-known recreational drug with potential for abuse. The dissociative trip caused by a moderate dose of ketamine has made it popular in clubs and raves since the 1970s, especially in Asian cities like Hong Kong. Its sedative effect made “special K” a date-rape drug. Doctors, patients, and the government agencies that fund research are often suspicious of a drug known to cause hallucinations, as they have been of psychedelics like psilocybin and ecstasy, despite their potential for treating depression or anxiety. Each tends to show fast results after a single dose, like ketamine.

In 1999, the same year ketamine was declared a controlled substance in the United States, Yale researchers happened upon its antidepressant power. A team co-led by Dennis Charney, now dean of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, in Manhattan, and John Krystal, now chair of the department of psychiatry at Yale, used ketamine to study glutamate: Since ketamine was known to block glutamate receptors, it might show what role the excitatory neurotransmitter plays in the depressed brain. To their surprise, they found that the drug made patients feel better, often within hours. A single dose, much smaller than what’s used for anesthesia, tended to last for weeks.

Since 1999, a dozen studies have replicated the results, often on patients who failed to respond to other drugs. Ketamine also works for bipolar people in depressive phases, without triggering mania, as classic antidepressants sometimes do. The majority of depressed people studied have responded to ketamine. For patients who are often suicidal, this fast response can be lifesaving. Some 50 doctors in the U.S. now offer ketamine infusions for depression.

The first evidence in humans that ketamine might work to prevent mood disorder came from the battlefield.

Many leaders in the field see the emergence of ketamine, and future fast antidepressants based on glutamate, as a great leap forward for the field. “In my mind,” Sanacora told NPR recently, “it is the most exciting development in mood-disorder treatment in the last 50 years.”

Ketamine and the old antidepressants both result in fuller neural “trees,” but by different routes, at different speeds. Prozac and other serotonin-based drugs take four to six weeks to kick in. A landmark 2003 Science study by Columbia University’s René Hen and Ronald Duman, now at Yale, found that serotonin-based antidepressants only work if they spur birth of new neurons in the hippocampus.3 These new neurons take four to six weeks to mature, roughly the same amount of time that conventional antidepressants take to lift a depressed person’s spirits. A 2010 paper argued that SSRIs like Prozac may work by dampening glutamate release in response to stress. So even old-school antidepressants, when they work, may act on the glutamate system.

Ketamine, on the other hand, seems to act directly on mature neurons, fertilizing them to grow branches more robustly, or protecting them against damage. Ketamine’s key effect is to block glutamate receptors of one type. This causes less calcium to flow into the neuron, reducing the risk of the neuron shrinking or self-destructing.

Today ketamine is offered by psychiatrists and anesthesiologists, at prices ranging from $300 to $1,000 per dose, for people who are morbidly depressed or have chronic pain. Insurance doesn’t usually cover the cost of an infusion, because even though it is FDA approved as an anesthetic, it has not been approved as an antidepressant. Each new use of a drug requires multiphase clinical trials for FDA approval, usually funded by pharmaceutical companies, which have little incentive to invest in a drug they can’t monetize. Ketamine got its original patent in 1966, and that expired long ago. So even if drug companies steered ketamine through the expensive approval process as an antidepressant, doctors could still prescribe the cheap, generic versions already available for anesthesia instead of pricier, patented versions intended for depression. This is an old story. Lithium carbonate, which also acts on glutamate receptors, is still one of the most reliable drugs for treating bipolar disorder. But lithium, which is an element, can’t be patented. So, despite their effectiveness, these generic pills do not attract many corporate dollars.

 Beck_BR-3

One tough truth about mood disorder is that not all forms may ever be curable. Brain-imaging studies have shown structural differences between the white matter in healthy versus bipolar brains. Differences in personality and sleep patterns also persist in bipolar people, even between manic or depressed episodes. The structural changes likely have genetic roots, and once they arise, are difficult or impossible to reverse.

Nevertheless, if a drug prevents a mood disorder from manifesting, it might prevent harmful anatomical changes from ever taking place. Just as a vaccine triggers the body to arm itself against a particular virus, a drug like ketamine, given before the crisis that triggers a breakdown, might protect the brain against the effects of stress. Like a vaccine, the drug might only need to be given once for lasting resilience.

The first evidence in humans that ketamine might work to prevent mood disorder, not just treat it, came from the battlefield. U.S. soldiers injured in Iraq were treated with various anesthetics, including ketamine. Since ketamine can cause hallucinations, surgeons worried that it might make trauma worse: Scary combat-related hallucinations could put soldiers at higher risk of mental illness.

But they found the opposite. Out of 25,000 service members wounded in Iraq between 2002 and 2007, the data showed, veterans treated with ketamine for burns had lower rates of post-traumatic stress disorder. Among civilians and soldiers hospitalized for burns, as many as 45 percent end up with PTSD. But soldiers treated with ketamine on the battlefield got PTSD about half as often—even though they had more severe burns requiring more surgeries and longer hospital stays.

Mental hospitals don’t usually see patients until they break: This isn’t how it works with other sicknesses.

Rebecca Brachman, a neuroscientist and recent doctoral graduate from Columbia University, and her supervisor, Christine Denny, tried giving ketamine to mice and then exposing them to stressors.4 The researchers tested several types of stress, including one in which subject mice are “bullied” by more aggressive mice for two weeks. After this daily hazing, mice ordinarily develop the rodent equivalent of PTSD and depression: freezing in a new space, refusing to interact with other mice, and not moving in a forced swim test. But the mice “vaccinated” before the bullying fared far better: They didn’t act depressed afterward. Brachman and Denny found that the protection from a single dose lasted for weeks, even though ketamine only stays in the body for a few hours. Though they haven’t tested it yet, it is possible that, like a vaccine, this protection could last for much longer. Their rodent research suggests ketamine may work even better as a prophylactic than as an antidepressant.

Denny says that we may eventually routinely use ketamine to prevent PTSD in combat veterans, rape victims, or survivors of car crashes or mass shootings. Ketamine seems to be most strongly protective in mice when given before stressful events, Brachman says. Since we can’t predict most traumatic life events, this would limit the drug’s utility. But if injected after a trauma yet before the psychological damage sets in—as with the burned soldiers—ketamine may still be protective. Denny is investigating this possibility now.

And in some situations, violent shock is predictable. “You don’t know when an earthquake will happen,” Brachman says, “but we do know when we’re about to send U.N. workers into an area devastated by a disaster.” When people know they are going into an acutely traumatic situation, she imagines, a preventive drug given ahead of time might protect their brains from the long-lasting effects of stress. Think of earthquake aid workers, fire fighters, or rescue workers in Syria, dragging mangled people from rubble.

The idea that a single injection could prevent mood disorders is a radical departure from current psychiatric thinking. But there are some precedents: Talk therapy and mindfulness meditation have long focused on building resilience to stress. Bipolar patients take “neuroprotective” drugs like lithium not to treat current symptoms, but as a protection against future breakdowns, for instance.

Not everyone is confident that ketamine is a safe bet, to be sure. Ketamine’s long-term safety is not known, says Nestler. No lasting ill effects are seen in anesthesia patients, who take much larger doses, but they haven’t received routine treatments, the way it is administered as an antidepressant.

Plus, ketamine’s reputation as a street drug is tough to shake. Many doctors consider the hallucinogenic an unacceptable risk for patients, who they fear may develop a taste for the high. Yale’s Sanacora points out that patients in his trial, who are screened for drug or alcohol abuse, often find the trip feeling unpleasant or disturbing. The psychedelic experience is surreal, he points out, not the mellowing pleasure of a drug like alcohol, Xanax, or heroin. Extreme ketamine trips, referred to as falling in a “K-hole,” are often compared to near-death or unsettling out-of-body experiences; they hardly sound like fun to most people.

But since the antidepressant dose is far lower than the one taken to get high, many patients don’t even notice. Drug companies are also competing to develop a less trippy alternative. Johnson & Johnson is testing a nasal spray form of esketamine, a version of ketamine with less psychoactive impact. A company called Naurex has finished phase II trials of Rapastinel, an injected drug that partially blocks the same glutamate receptors as ketamine, but is not psychedelic.

The ketamine pioneers emphasize that their prevention research is the beginning of a new road, raising hopes, rather than offering an immediate cure. Brachman and Denny stress that ketamine may not be the drug that ultimately makes it into widespread use; like the anti-tubercular drugs in the 1950s that spawned the antidepressant era, it is the first to trail-blaze this new class of psychiatric prophylactics. “What this work shows us is that we can intervene beforehand and create some sort of self-reinforcing stress resilience,” Brachman says. “We didn’t know that before; that’s what’s important. Everything else—should we use it, how should we use it—that all comes later.”

Taylor Beck is a journalist based in Brooklyn. Before writing, he worked in brain imaging labs studying memory, aging, and dreams.

References

1. Maxwell, R.A. & Eckhardt, S.B. Drug Discovery Humana Press, New York, NY (1990).

2. Kennedy, S.H., et al. Differences in brain glucose metabolism between responders to CBT and venlafaxine in a 16-week randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 778-788 (2007).

3. Vogel, G. Depression drugs’ powers may rest on new neurons. Science 301, 757 (2003).

4. Brachman, R.A., et al. Ketamine as a prophylactic against stress-induced depressive-like behavior.Biological Psychiatry (2015). Retrieved from DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.022

*Images reprinted from Popoli, M., Yan, Z., McEwen, B., & Sanacora, G. The stressed synapse: the impact of stress and glucocorticoids on glutamate transmission. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13, 22-37 (2011).

Northern Virginia Ketamine Treatment Center | 703-844-0184 | NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Nasal spray Ketamine Center | Ketamine for depression | PTSD | Loudon Virginia Ketamine 20175 | 703-844-0184 |Northern Virginia Ketamine | MClean, Va Ketamine | McLean, Va 22101 | 703-844-0184 | CBD center | Depression Treatment

NOVA Health recovery | Northern Virginia Ketamine Treatment Center | 703-844-0184 Call for an appointment | Fairfax, Virginia 22304

Is Ketamine Safe and Effective for Depression?

The anesthetic ketamine, used in both humans and animals, is perhaps best known as an illegal party drug due to its hallucinogenic effects. However, a growing body of research indicates that the drug may have a powerful new medical use: as a fast-acting antidepressant without the side effects seen in most prescription antidepressants.

As Nature reports, in many clinical trials to date people who have not responded to standard antidepressant treatment — such as SSRIs including Prozac — seem to respond to ketamine. And while it can take weeks to feel better after starting a prescription antidepressant, the therapeutic effects of ketamine are seen in a matter of hours.

Despite the seemingly “miracle drug” nature of ketamine, there are serious concerns about its use in depression. First, it is unclear how the drug works to alleviate depression. Second, there are no long-term studies on its long-term use. Studies that have already been done indicate the antidepressant effects of ketamine can last from between a few days to a few weeks.

And due to the addictive nature of ketamine itself, there are worries that sustained use of it may lead to dependence.

On May 4, Nature published the results of the latest trial involving ketamine, bolstering its potential as an antidepressant treatment. Researchers, examining the drug in mice, found that that the mood boosting effects may not be caused by ketamine itself, but instead by one of the metabolites ((2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine) formed when the drug is broken down into smaller pieces.

Even more promising, the ketamine given to the rats did not increase side effects, even though the dose was much stronger than what would be given to humans for depression. The researchers say they want to take the metabolite into testing in humans, though that is likely years away.

The largest trial ever of ketamine in depression was done in 2013 with 73 participants. The drug lead to a decline in depression symptoms 24 hours after treatment in 64% of patients, all of whom had tried at least 3 other drugs without any results.  Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment resistant depression

Despite the lack of clear-cut evidence of its benefits and unknowns about its long-term risk, many doctors are already offering ketamine as a depression treatments to patients, though this is an off-label use.

Side effects of ketamine can include confusion, lucid daydreaming, fuzzy vision, and a “high” feeling, though they tend to go away quickly, according to these doctors. Patients, who are usually given ketamine via infusion, are carefully monitored and must have pre-arranged transport home. They can’t drive or use heavy machinery for 24 hours.

Drug companies are even trying to cash in on the ketamine craze. Janssen Pharmaceutical is testing a form of ketamine it developed, called esketamine, in 5 clinical trials. It would be given via a nasal spray. Another is rapastinel, under development by Allergan. Both drugs had “breakthrough therapy designation” from the FDA, meaning they will go through the regulatory process at a much quicker rate.

NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites