NOVA Health Recovery | Alexandria, Va 22306 | Call for esketamine and nasal ketamine as well as IV Ketamine for depression, PTSD, anxiety 703-844-0184 < Link
Calming magnesium, amino acids and herbs. Sleep Relief contains magnesium, a gentler muscle relaxer. The amino acids L-Tryptophan, L-Theanine, glycine and GABA and herbs such as Hops (Humulus lupulus) and Skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora) all contribute to the calming effects of Sleep Relief by targeting different neurological and biochemical pathways.
- L-Tryptophan is converted to serotonin and melatonin. Serotonin is a mood-elevating hormone and melatonin is a circadian modulator that helps regulate your body’s day and night cycle.
- L-Theanine promotes alpha wave brain activity, which is associated with alert relaxation.
- Glycine and GABA are nutrients that acts as naturally calming neurotransmitters that promote relaxation.
- Hops and Skullcap are ancient plants that have long histories of use in traditional healing systems. Native Americans relied on them for a wide variety of medicinal purposes, and extensive research has validated many of their traditional applications, including promoting healthy sleep.
Adaptogenic herbs like Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) and Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba). Adaptogens are a unique class of healing plants. They help balance, restore and protect the body. Ashwagandha and Jujube are ancient plants that have been used in traditional Asian medicine for thousands of years and can promote a healthy stress response.
Nutritional Biochemistry, Inc. (NBI) formulates and manufactures products that give results. Started by John Neustadt, ND, in 2006 when he couldn’t find formulas he needed to help his patients and family, NBI products solve 2 problems he was having. Existing products didn’t contain the dose or combination of nutrients used in clinical trials and actually shown to work. Equally frustrating, other companies would cite studies on their websites, but then use lower amounts of nutrients than what was used in the study, or use entirely different nutrients that weren’t supported by the research.
Neustadt’s latest creation is Sleep Relief . NBI’s Sleep Relief is a breakthrough in sleep technology. Its bi-phasic, time-release technology delivers NBI’s proprietary formula with clinically validated nutrients in two stages—a quick-release first stage and a slow-release second stage to help you gently fall asleep, stay asleep and wake refreshed and ready for your day. NBI’s Osteo-K  delivers the clinical dose of nutrients shown in more than 25 clinical trials to grow stronger bones and reduce fractures more than 80%.
NBI is and always has been a family-owned company. We don’t manufacture anything we wouldn’t take ourselves or give to our own family. No matter what we do, our promise to physicians using our products is to help their patients, and to customers purchasing directly from NBI, is uncompromising quality.
NBI is a name you can trust. But don’t take our word for it. Spend some time on our website , learn about our products, and educate yourself on the hundreds of research citations and studies that they’re based on.
Karolyn Gazella: Hello. I’m Karolyn Gazella, publisher of the Natural Medicine Journal. Thank you so much for joining me. Today, our topic is the integrative approach to insomnia. During this interview, we will learn that insomnia is a significant problem for many patients that can have far reaching physical, mental and emotional health ramifications. We will also learn how to successfully treat this condition by using a combination of diet, lifestyle recommendations, and dietary supplements.
My expert guest today is Dr. John Neustadt. Dr. Neustadt received his naturopathic doctorate from Bastyr University and he was the founder and medical director of Montana Integrative Health.
Before we begin, I’d like to thank the sponsor of this topic who is Nutritional Biochemistry Incorporated, or NBI, manufacturers of high-quality dietary supplements for health care professionals.
Dr. Neustadt, thank you so much for joining me today.
John Neustadt, ND: Thank you for having me on.
Gazella: Well, so the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention calls lack of sleep a public health epidemic. Now, that seems pretty significant so today we’re going to talk specifically about insomnia. How common is insomnia in particular?
Neustadt: Well, the CDC is absolutely correct. It is a public health epidemic. Up to 80% of people struggle at some point with what’s considered transient insomnia, less than two weeks of duration and insomnia effects 10 to 15 percent of the general population.
In primary care settings, it’s estimated that up to almost 70 percent of primary care patients have insomnia so it is incredibly common.
Gazella: Oh, yeah that is. So how does lack of sleep impact a patient’s overall health from like a physical, mental, emotional standpoint?
Neustadt: It has devastating impacts. There are two ways to think of it. One is short-term impacts and the other are the long-term impacts. So, short term it can impact decreased job performance, impact social and family life by creating greater fatigue. I mean, just you’re more tired during the day. Decreased mood and depression, increases in anxiety and stress. Decreased vigor and just not being able to cope with the demands of daily life and be able to complete tasks. That’s only short term. Devastating just in the short term.
But in the long term, it can be a killer. There, if people are sleeping an average of less than six hours per night, it can increase the … or decrease the quality of life at the same magnitude of a similar condition such as congestive heart failure and major depressive disorder. It’s an early symptom for Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease and Huntington’s Disease and there’s a sweet spot for sleeping of about eight hours. That research shows is the healthiest, and if you’re sleeping less than six, or longer than nine hours, it increases your risk for diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and death and, in fact, for metabolic syndrome, there’s a 45 percent increase in risk compared to people who are sleeping seven to eight hours a night.
Gazella: Wow, so yeah, so this is a very important topic for clinicians to have on their radar. So, when you’re evaluating a patient with a sleep disorder such as insomnia, how do you approach the work up?
Neustadt: Well, insomnia’s really a qualitative diagnosis. It’s how are they … how do they feel that they’re sleeping? How do they feel that it’s impacting their health? Now the DSM official diagnosis, there is a quantitative or a couple of quantitative aspects to that and that is it’s occurring at least three nights per week, and present for at least three months. So understand the difference between transient insomnia, less than two weeks, versus the diagnosis, official diagnosis, needs to be going on for greater than three months.
So there’s a huge discrepancy there and in time periods and clinically it’s important to be aware of that because these detrimental and dangerous effects of insomnia and sleep deprivation definitely are occurring in shorter than three months period of time. They’re happening pretty quickly if someone’s not getting enough sleep and even over a few days the short term consequences.
And so what I ask people about is how many hours, on average, do they think they’re sleeping a night? Do they have any difficulty with falling asleep or staying asleep called sleep phase delay or sleep phase advance? Are they waking refreshed in the morning? What’s going on with them psychosocially? Are there any stresses going on at work or in relationships or financially that’s increasing their anxiety and could be impacting their sleep? Are they are risk for any hormonal abnormalities or imbalances because the research is clear that low estrogen, low or high testosterone, elevated TSH, those are all things that can create insomnia. Abnormal progesterone, as well.
And then looking at medications because there are some medications that can impact sleep, as well.
Gazella: Yeah, let’s talk about the medications that can impact sleep. What are some of those medications that can impact sleep?
Neustadt: Well, prednisone, that can cause hyper-arousal, or can cause somebody to not sleep, not be able to fall asleep, or have fragmented sleep. Beta-blockers, very common heart medications, can decrease melatonin production. So we know what the mechanism of action … their interaction of sleep is they decrease melatonin and can cause poor sleep.
Some antidepressants, actually, can cause poor sleep. Antidepressants can, depending on the antidepressants, can either cause somebody to not be able to sleep enough or can cause hypersomnolence, somebody to be sleeping too much. So looking at those, looking up … it’s very easy to look up whatever medication they’re taking quickly and see, besides the ones that I mentioned, could it be potentially interfering and impacting with their sleep.
Gazella: So I’ve been hearing about hyperarousal, or the hyperarousal hypothesis, which I find quite fascinating. What is the hyperarousal hypothesis and how can it affect what is recommended to patients?
Neustadt: Great question. So the hyperarousal hypothesis I like to refer to as “wired-but-tired.” And it occurs to people typically who are under a lot of stress, they have elevated cortisol, and when they end up trying to fall asleep they just can’t turn their mind off, or even if their mind isn’t racing, they just can’t calm down. Their body can’t relax and settle into sleep. They’re staring at the ceiling, it can cause fragmented sleep. And that wired-but-tired, again, typically occurs in people who are under chronic stress.
Gazella: Yeah. And you know the other day when you and I were talking as it related to the hyperarousal hypothesis, you were telling me about something else that was new to me and it was called social jet lag. Talk a little bit about social jet lag and the research associated with social jet lag.
Neustadt: I’m so happy you brought this up because I love this as well. Fitbit, that maker of the wearable tracking devices, and tracking people’s sleep as well, they had access, because of their users, to over six billion data points of sleep. And they looked at those. And they looked at the data and determined that the biggest predictor of healthy sleep, restful sleep, is going to bed at about the same time every night. Basically training our body that it’s bedtime, getting that routine.
Social jet lag occurs when people are going to bed at about the same time every night during the week but then the weekend comes. Friday night they go out, hang out with friends, stay out late. Saturday night maybe do the same thing, and then Sunday comes around and they try to go to bed again at their weekday, or their work week time, and they can’t fall asleep. And essentially what they’ve done is it’s as if they’ve flown to another time zone and their body thinks that it’s not time to go to sleep yet. And they’ve induced their own jet lag called social jet lag.
And so one of the things that Fitbit found, and I think one of the most impactful things, is showing that getting that regular bedtime, being in that routine, going to bed at about the same time every night is one of the best things people can do for improving their sleep.
Gazella: And even on the weekend, and I’ll tell, you, when you put this on my radar I, of course, had to do a little research and there’s a lot of studies on this that actually show that the physical effects that you talked about with sleep deprivation earlier also occur with this social jet lag. So I think it’s really important for clinicians to be aware of that. So thank you for bringing this to my attention.
So now doctors often prescribe benzodiazepine or benzodiazepine-like drugs to help patients sleep. What are some of the potential risks of these particular medications?
Neustadt: Well, the potential risks are very well documented and they increase risk for falling, dizziness, light-headedness, those risks are increased in people who are 60 years or older because their ability to metabolize the drug tends to decrease. And so because it increases the risk for falls and dizziness and light-headedness, it then increases the risk for fall-related injuries, such as osteoporotic fractures, such as concussions, such as death, even. But even beyond those risks associated with increased risks for falling, the research has shown that cancer risk is actually increased in people who take over about 132 doses of benzodiazepine a year. So that’s even … that’s less than half of a year worth.
And in fact some of these risks are increased with very small and limited exposure. So you know from half a dose to 18 doses per year, the hazard risk for death is increased 3.6 times. 18 to 132 doses, the hazard risk for death increased 4.43 times in a study that looked at this. And for greater than 132 doses, it increases 5.32 times. That’s 532 percent greater than somebody not taking these medications for death. And the research has shown to actually get one benefit, the number needed to treat, to have one patient benefit is 13 patients. But the number to treat to create harm is only 6 patients.
Gazella: Yeah, that’s problematic. So what about the newer class of medications, like the orexin receptor antagonist Belsomra?
Neustadt: Belsomra came on the market in 2015, it’s a schedule 4 drug and it’s a CNS depressant. So, like other CNS depressants, like benzodiazepine, it can have similar adverse effects. Some of the benzodiazepine drugs like Lunesta or Ambien can also cause, like Belsomra, can cause daytime impairment including impaired driving skills, risk of falling asleep while driving, abnormal thinking and behavioral changes are part of the adverse events spectrum, including amnesia, anxiety, hallucinations, other neuropsychiatric symptoms, even complex behaviors like sleep-driving. I mean, you’re driving while not fully awake, after taking the hypnotic. Or other complex behaviors have been documented, like preparing and eating food, making phone calls, or even having sex, without remembering it.
And so the drug has some serious risks, including worsening of depression and suicidal ideation, and the benefits of that, it can increase … or the benefits of the medication, because all medication, it’s a risk-reward calculation … it can decrease sleep latency, that is, the amount of time to fall asleep by about eight to 10 minutes and increase sleep duration by 17 to 20 minutes.
So at the most beneficial end of that, maybe it’s 30 extra minutes of sleep. But you get all of those risks associated with it.
Gazella: And are patients getting good sleep when they’re on these prescription and over-counter medications? Are they getting good quality sleep?
Neustadt: Well, you raise a great point. That’s one of the problems with all of these medications is they tend to increase sleep duration, sleep quantity, but they’re not increasing sleep quality. They’re not getting patients into that deep, restorative phrases of sleep, the slow-wave sleep, phase 3 and into phase 4, to get that good, restorative sleep.
So the quantity of the sleep may be increased but the quality has not been shown to be increased.
Gazella: So you’ve made a pretty compelling case that a more integrated, holistic approach is needed. And integrative practitioners often recommend melatonin for insomnia with their patients. Can you talk a little bit about melatonin and why for some patients, many even many patients, it may not be enough?
Neustadt: Melatonin is one of the first things I find that people with whom I speak, they’ve tried. They’ve reached for that. If they’re going to try a natural product, they’ve reached for the melatonin, you know, first, almost universally.
The challenge with melatonin is that it’s got a very short half life, 40 to 50 minutes. And so while melatonin is considered a circadian modulator, meaning it helps the body recognize day from night, and it is a natural hormone, a natural product that our body uses to help us fall asleep, it’s not really used for sleep maintenance. And so when somebody takes melatonin to help them fall asleep, because it’s got such a short half life, well 50 percent of the melatonin is eliminated from the body in less than an hour, so let’s just be generous and say an hour for easy calculations. So common doses out there is a 3 mg dose. So in an hour, they’ve got a one and a half milligrams left. An hour later they’ve got .75 milligrams left. And on down.
And so 3, 4 hours later, essentially most of that melatonin is out of their body and they wake up again. I hear so often people who take melatonin, they end up waking up in the middle of the night, still. And so what do they do? Well, they might need more melatonin. And so they keep taking higher and higher doses until they’re sleeping through the night and then they wake up feeling drugged in the morning. Groggy, hungover and it takes them hours to actually feel fully awake.
So the natural rhythm of melatonin in our body is that the rise in melatonin occurs around 10 PM and then it peaks at about 2 AM in the morning, and it declines at approximately 6 AM, it’s declined back to baseline. And that makes sense because that’s sort of the rhythm of when we start to fall asleep and when our body then starts to wake up. Of course melatonin is balanced with other hormones as well that the body is producing during sleep, but the immediate release of melatonin that people are taking is not mimicking the body’s cycle of melatonin production during the night. And it’s also not a complete solution because it’s not dealing with the other phases of sleep, we’re looking at the other hormones in sleep, GABA for example. Or the other variables that can impact sleep such as poor blood sugar. When blood sugar can drop, hormones are secreted like cortisol and epinephrine to increase the body’s blood sugar and we wake up.
And so that’s why melatonin for a lot of people doesn’t work, because it’s just not a complete enough solution.
Gazella: I think that’s a really good point, that it’s not a complete solution for many people and that’s why you use such an integrative approach. So I’d like to really dig into your integrative approach, I’d like to talk about dietary supplements, diet, and other lifestyle factors. So as long as we’re talking about melatonin, let’s keep on that subject and talk about dietary supplements. Are there specific dietary supplements that you use in your clinical practice specifically for insomnia?
Neustadt: There are and it depends typically on the clinical picture. So for example if somebody has muscle aches or tight muscles that’s keeping them from sleeping, magnesium can help, that can be a gentle muscle relaxant. If there’s some anxiety that may keep them from sleep, well, glycine is an amino acid that’s also an inhibitory neurotransmitter, that can be helpful. GABA also an inhibitory neurotransmitter used in the body available as a dietary supplement. That can be helpful. Botanical extracts such as alphianine increases alpha-wave production in the brain which is associated with calming, alert calmness. Then there are some sedative botanicals that can be helpful such as hops or skullcap, also called Scutellaria. And others.
So that’s part of it and for potential, looking at decreasing the response to stress, I like using, if they’re under a lot of stress, some adaptogenic herbs like ashwagandha, or jujube, magnolia bark extract. If there is vaso … if there’s an issue with hot flashes and perimenopause, pine back extract. There’s a clinical trial on that showing that it improved sleep quality and sleep quantity.
And so I typically, you know, this monotherapy approach of one symptom, 1 pill, it really doesn’t work when we’re looking at complex pathologies like insomnia or many other chronic issues. And so I tend to like products that combine those different nutrients shown in clinical trials to work that target the underlying pathology, the underlying biochemical pathways at work and sleep and affected by insomnia in a time release or a biphasic time release delivery system because it more closely mimics the body’s natural rhythm of the 2 major categories of your sleep. One is helping somebody fall asleep, you know how do we do that, and the other, over … you know, the subsequent 6, 7 hours later after they’ve fallen asleep, how do we help them stay asleep?
And so that’s how I conceptualize it and that’s the overall approach with dietary supplements when they’re indicated.
Gazella: So before I move on to diet, I know that you helped formulate and create a specific sleep supplement. I want you to tell me the name of that supplement but I also want you to tell me why you created it, because let’s face it, there are a lot of sleep supplements in the market. So why did you want to create the supplement that you created?
Neustadt: So the name of the product is NBI’s, my company, NBI’s Sleep Relief is the name of the product. And I created it for a couple reasons.
One, just like all the products that I’ve created in NBI and formulated, I couldn’t find the combination of nutrients or the dose and form of nutrients in a product shown in clinical trials to actually work. And I personally suffered from insomnia for years and years. And I tried a lot of different things. It wasn’t helping me. I’d work with a lot of my patients trying to different things, having to dispense different bottles of products, in addition of course to working with diet and lifestyle and other psychosocial factors involved. And I couldn’t find something that worked consistently.
And so I started digging into the sleep research, the pathophysiology of sleep, the clinical trials, what are the underlying mechanisms affecting sleep. And after over a year of research and formulating and working, trying over a dozen different combinations and doses, that’s when I created Sleep Relief.
Gazella: Okay perfect, Sleep Relief. So now let’s talk a little bit about diet. What are some of the things that you recommend to your patients when it comes to sleep, associated with diet that may not be on the radar of some practitioners?
Neustadt: So one of the big things that I see over and over is a lot of people have, may have acid reflux and they don’t know about it. And because maybe it’s not … maybe they have a cough when they lay down, maybe they are just not aware that that’s going on. And so evaluating for that because that can wake people up.
The other thing that I find with diet that’s very important, and with acid reflux, you know, that can be diet related. There are 5 most common foods that can contribute to that and interrupt sleep, that’s raw garlic and onion, chocolate, coffee, and citrus. Although other things can do it for other people. An infection can do that, H. Pylori can cause that as well. And then if they have a hernia, a hiatal hernia, that can cause it as well. So looking at that, looking at those underlying potential causes if that is involved.
The other thing is poor blood sugar control which I already mentioned. And one of the things I like to ask that can indicate if they might have poor blood sugar control is if they get that afternoon, postprandial tiredness. You know, about 3, 4 o’clock in the afternoon, a couple hours after lunch do they just get that energy slump. And that can be an indication that they’re having a little bit of blood sugar control issues. Or are they waking up at the same time every night. Both of those questions can give clues.
And if that does seem to be involved, one thing that I love to try with patients … it doesn’t work very often but when it does, it’s really a home run, and that is ask them to eat 8 to 10 grams of protein before bed. Protein’s one of the best ways to regulate blood sugar. And so if they do that and it stabilizes their blood sugar and they then are sleeping through the night, well, again, it’s a home run. I mean, there are no pills, no powders, it’s just natural doing it with food and it also opens the door for even more discussions with helping them understand how they can improve their diet during the day to help, to eat, to promote … to help them understand how they can eat, changes they can make to eat, the promote their health for the rest of their life.
Gazella: Yeah, those are some great suggestions when it comes to diet. Now let’s talk a little bit about lifestyle. What are some things that may not be on the radar of some practitioners when it comes to lifestyle aspects?
Neustadt: So we talked about going to sleep at about the same time every night, that’s really important. The other thing is … and most practitioners, or hopefully all of them have heard of sleep hygiene. The research shows that about the 69 to 70 degrees for most people is the ideal temperature for sleep. Some people who, if they’re in a relationship with their partner, they may like different temperatures may be most comfortable for them.
So there are wonderful things out there now, it’s call the ChiliPad, that you can get, it’s a pad you can put on your bed, where you can control the temperature on each side of the bed. So that can be really helpful.
Stress of course is a big issue in our society, a lot of people are under chronic stress, so anything that we can do to help people decrease their stress or better deal with stress is really important. And a fantastic study came out recently that showed that a lot of the impact of stress is not the actual event happening to us, it’s how we view it. So if people view stress as a good thing, meaning “I gotta learn something from it and what can I take from this,” the health impacts from stress are mitigated. If somebody sees a stressful event and they’re internalizing it and they’re not seeing it as a growth opportunity, then it magnifies the negative stress impacts.
So, A) getting them to just understand that mindset is really important, just when it comes to stress happening, and then what can they do to have more control over those events that may be causing them stress to decrease that stress. And that could mean creating healthy boundaries for themselves. That could mean doing any yoga or mind-body techniques. You know there’s lots of things that we can offer to patients that can be incredibly, incredibly helpful.
Gazella: Yeah, I would agree. And now your approach focuses on diet, lifestyle, and dietary supplements. How important is it to focus on all 3? So some practitioners might be really focused on the person’s diet, or some might be looking at their stress level, and some might be focused on just melatonin. Why is it so important to look at this from an integrative standpoint?
Neustadt: Well I think if we want to do the best job we possibly can for our patients and give them the best results, looking at it through a more integrative approach is important. And I like the approach of trying dietary supplements to give people benefit quickly. So if somebody is sleep deprived, it’s gonna increase their tendency to reach for those comfort foods. I think we’ve probably all experienced that. And especially because what happens with insomnia and sleep deprivation, it decreases mood. It can cause depression. And sugary foods, for example, when we reach for those, it can increase our serotonin production and temporarily lift mood. But it causes this rollercoaster of insulin and blood sugar that’s hard to get off of.
So just getting people sleep can help improve their mood. So I like the dietary supplement approach for triage to get them feeling better so they can make healthier decisions, have a more present mindset, be more proactive instead of reactive, while I’m working with them also on improving their diet. Transitioning to a healthier way of eating, which, the research has shown, unambiguously is the Mediterranean pattern of eating. And also stress reduction and exercise and those things as well.
Gazella: Yeah, I mean that all makes a lot of sense. And this is a very important topic and I want to thank you, Dr. Neustadt for a very interesting conversation and once again, I’d also thank today’s sponsor, Nutritional Biochemistry Incorporated, or NBI. Thanks again, Dr. Neustadt, for joining me.
Neustadt: Thank you for the opportunity.
Naltrexone could alleviate depression symptoms in patients who relapsed while taking antidepressants
The drug naltrexone is approved for use in the treatment of opioid use disorders and alcohol use disorders, but preliminary research suggests it could also aid the treatment of depression.
The double-blind, randomized study found that low dose naltrexone reduced depression severity in 12 depressed subjects who had relapsed on dopamine-enhancing antidepressants. The study will be published in the January 2017 issue of the Journal of Affective Disorders.
Mischoulon: Our group studies a wide variety of treatments for depression. We are especially interested in the underlying biology of antidepressants and mechanisms by which depression develops. This study of low dose naltrexone (LDN) was based on a model proposed by Bear and Kessler, originally for restless leg syndrome for which it was patented. During treatment of patients with RLS, they observed anecdotally that LDN seemed to benefit depression as well.
Because one of the apparent mechanisms of low dose naltrexone is through dopamine, which is a neurotransmitter associated with mood regulation, Dr Bear’s company, PharmoRx, was interested in funding a pilot study on this agent for people with depression who had relapsed on dopaminergic antidepressants. They spoke with us about running such a study at MGH, and we agreed to do it.
What should the average person take away from your study?
The main finding is that if you have depression and relapsed while taking a previously effective antidepressant that works primarily by dopaminergic mechanisms, addition of LDN could potentially alleviate the depression in combination with the original antidepressant.
PsyPost interviewed the study’s corresponding author, David Mischoulon of Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School. Read his explanation of the research below:
he main limitation of this work is the small patient sample. We only treated 12 patients and this is too few to draw firm conclusions. We need to replicate this work in a larger group of patients. The study included only antidepressants that work by dopaminergic mechanisms, and so we don’t know how well it would work with other types of antidepressants, such as those that are primarily serotonergic (e.g. SSRIs) or noradrenergic (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants).
Also, LDN may involve a range of different doses that are defined as “low,” and so a dose-finding study to determine the optimal “low” dose would also be valuable to do. Clinicians who wish to prescribe LDN for depressive relapse should realize that this is considered an experimental therapy, and should inform their patients about the risks of trying a relatively unproven therapy.
Is there anything else you would like to add?
While LDN is obtainable by prescription from a licensed physician, it cannot be bought in most drugstores, because commercially available forms of naltrexone come in much higher doses. To obtain LDN you will need to take your prescription to a compounding pharmacy where they can prepare it for you in the appropriate dosage form. Most insurance plans will cover it, however, so LDN should be accessible to most people.
In addition to Mischoulon, the study “Randomized, proof-of-concept trial of low dose naltrexone for patients with breakthrough symptoms of major depressive disorder on antidepressants” was co-authored by Lindsay Hylek, Albert S. Yeung, Alisabet J. Clain, Lee Baer, Cristina Cusin, Dawn Flosnik Ionescu, Jonathan E. Alpert, David P. Soskin and Maurizio Fava.
Clinicians are increasingly using low-dose naltrexone to treat challenging illnesses such as autoimmune conditions and neurodegenerative disease. LDN is extremely safe and well tolerated, especially compared to the drugs typically used to treat these conditions, making LDN a valuable tool for clinicians and an important focus for ongoing research.
As a practitioner, you may be familiar with the drug naltrexone, which was approved by the FDA in 1984 for treating addiction patients. In doses of 50 to 100 milligrams, naltrexone completely blocks opioid receptors in the brain, preventing patients from experiencing a high when they take opioid drugs.
Soon after the drug’s initial approval, Dr. Bernard Bihari discovered a potential alternate application for naltrexone. He noticed that in AIDS and cancer patients, a much lower dose of naltrexone (about 3 milligrams) had beneficial immune-modulating effects. This discovery gave rise to a grassroots movement of patients and practitioners who had seen LDN work and were calling for additional research and mainstream attention.
Despite the promise of this new treatment, formal research on LDN has been slow to happen, likely because LDN is off patent and therefore not as profitable to drug companies. Even so, our understanding of the mechanisms behind LDN’s effectiveness in various conditions continues to progress, and results from preliminary clinical trials are slowly being published.
In this article, I’ll describe our current understanding of LDN’s mechanisms and review the clinical trials that have been conducted thus far. I’ll also give you a more practical take on LDN from my perspective as a clinician and cover concerns that might be relevant for other clinicians who want to prescribe LDN to their patients.
How Does LDN Work?
As research on LDN progresses, it appears more and more likely that it functions through a variety of different mechanisms and that the most relevant mechanism might differ depending on the disease that is being treated. But at this point, the two most well-characterized functions of LDN are as an opioid antagonist and an anti-inflammatory.
Increasing Endogenous Opioid Activity
Like its full-dose counterpart, low-dose naltrexone blocks opioid receptors in the brain, the major difference being that LDN is cleared from the system after only a few hours. Most researchers believe that this temporary opioid receptor blockade creates a “rebound effect,” resulting in up-regulated production of the endogenous opioids beta-endorphin and met-enkephalin, as well as increased expression of opioid receptors (1).
How these adaptive changes affect the disease processes that LDN influences is less established. However, several mechanisms have been proposed. First, endogenous opioids are known to have analgesic and stress-relieving effects, which alone could account for some of the symptom relief seen with LDN.
What the latest research says about low-dose naltrexone
Second, we know that immune cells possess opioid receptors, and both endogenous and exogenous opioids have long been considered important immune modulators (2, 3). The exact effects of endogenous opioids on the immune system, however, remain unclear; both increases and decreases in immune cell activity and proliferation have been observed in response to LDN, as well as beta-endorphin and met-enkephalin (4, 5, 6).
These endogenous opioids may also exert therapeutic benefits based on their regulation of cellular proliferation. Met-enkephalin, also known as opioid growth factor (OGF), has been found to regulate the cell cycle by suppressing DNA synthesis via its action on the OGF receptor (7, 8). This so-called “OGF–OGFr axis” is the focus of research on LDN for treating cancer and may also be another mechanism by which LDN modulates immune function.
Reducing Inflammation in the CNS
LDN appears to have a second mechanism of action that is independent from the opiate-antagonist pathway described above: suppression of microglial activity. Microglia are the primary immune cells in the central nervous system and are responsible for creating inflammation in response to pathogens or injury. When activated, microglia secrete factors such as pro-inflammatory cytokines, prostaglandins, nitric oxide, and excitatory amino acids (9).
The activation of the microglia and the subsequent release of cytokines—though essential to protecting the brain and CNS—cause symptoms such as fatigue, reduced pain tolerance, sleep and mood disturbances, cognitive disruption, and general malaise, all classically referred to as “sickness behaviors” (10). While these adaptive symptoms may make sense in the short term for promoting rest and recovery, ongoing CNS inflammation is maladaptive and can contribute to a wide range of diseases and syndromes.
Evidence indicates that LDN can suppress microglial activation, likely via its antagonistic effect on toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), a non-opioid receptor that is found on macrophages such as microglia (11). This mechanism may explain LDN’s effectiveness for conditions like fibromyalgia and other chronic pain disorders, which involve chronic activation of microglial cells.
LDN in the Scientific Literature
Unfortunately, research on LDN as a treatment for human disease is still extremely sparse. Most of the trials that have been conducted thus far were primarily intended to test the tolerability and safety of LDN, rather than the efficacy, so keep that in mind, but the initial research does show promise. I’ve summarized the existing studies below, and hopefully additional research won’t be far behind.
A small open-label pilot study from 2007 had remarkable results, reporting that 89 percent of participants responded to LDN, and a whopping 67 percent achieved remission (12). This was the first published LDN trial in humans.
Results from two subsequent randomized controlled trials were less dramatic, but still extremely promising. One study from 2011 reported significant improvement in 88 percent of the participants in the LDN group, compared to 40 percent in the placebo group (13). And 33 percent of participants in the LDN group achieved remission, compared to 8 percent in the placebo group, although this difference was not statistically significant.
The second RCT was published in 2013 and looked at the effectiveness of LDN in children with Crohn’s disease (14). They found that of those treated with LDN, 67 percent exhibited improvement, and 25 percent went into remission. In all of these studies, LDN was very well tolerated with no significant difference in side effects compared to placebo.
Fibromyalgia and Other Conditions
In 2009, a pilot study involving 10 fibromyalgia patients reported a greater than 30 percent reduction in symptoms over placebo in those taking LDN (15). Interestingly, they found that patients with a higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at baseline had greater symptom reduction in response to LDN treatment. ESR is a marker for inflammation, so this observation lends credence to the theory that LDN works by reducing inflammation in the central nervous system.
The second study, a randomized controlled trial involving 31 fibromyalgia patients, was published in 2013. They reported significant improvements in pain, mood, and general satisfaction with life in the LDN group compared to placebo (16). And again, LDN was well tolerated in these studies.
LDN has also been studied in and shown potential efficacy for autism (17), pain (18, 19), depression (20), multiple sclerosis (21, 22, 23), systemic sclerosis (24), and complex regional pain syndrome (25). Additionally, preliminary evidence in vitro and in animal models indicates that LDN may be an effective treatment for cancer, including ovarian cancer and pancreatic cancer (26, 27).
Clinical Success Using LDN for Autoimmune and Neurodegenerative Diseases
As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, LDN is unusual in that its use has spread as a result of grassroots efforts by patients themselves, rather than the typical top-down marketing of new drugs by pharmaceutical companies. Because of this, clinical and anecdotal evidence for the drug’s effectiveness in a wide variety of conditions still vastly outpaces the scientific literature.
This is initially a cause for concern because we obviously want any treatment we use on patients to be as evidence based and extensively studied as possible. But we do have ample safety data from the approval process of full-dose naltrexone, and all of the evidence we have so far on LDN shows that it is extremely safe and well tolerated. It’s still a judgment call, but the fact that existing treatments for many of these illnesses are demonstrably toxic with significant side effects certainly makes LDN an attractive option.
Conditions that have clinically responded well to LDN but have not been formally studied include autoimmune diseases such as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, Graves’ disease, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, and ulcerative colitis, as well as neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, and other conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome and even infertility. Because these conditions share the same underlying disease processes of immune dysregulation and inflammation, it’s not a huge surprise that LDN can be an effective treatment, despite the differences in disease presentation.
Practical Concerns for Prescribing LDN
LDN is generally very well tolerated, but patients may experience insomnia, headaches, or unusually vivid dreams when first starting the medication. These side effects are usually minor and dissipate after a week or two of taking LDN.
Because naltrexone is only produced in 50-milligram tablets, prescriptions for LDN do need to be filled at a compounding pharmacy. And, because LDN is off label, it’s unlikely that insurance companies will cover it, but the out-of-pocket cost of LDN is only about $40 per month, making it more affordable than many drugs on the market.
One downside of LDN is that there’s not a standardized dose, and the most effective dose for a given patient may be anywhere from 1.25 to 4.5 milligrams. We typically start patients on 1 to 1.5 milligrams, then gradually increase to 4.5 milligrams and see how they do. From my experience, I’ve seen most people end up around 2.5 to 3 milligrams.
Note that in patients with Hashimoto’s or Graves’, their previous dose of thyroid medication could suddenly be too high as their thyroid function improves on LDN. It may be necessary to reduce their normal thyroid medication to prevent them from becoming hypo- or hyperthyroid.
Finally, be aware that while LDN can be miraculous for some patients, others may see no benefits at all. Unfortunately we don’t know enough yet to determine if there’s a subset of patients that LDN is most likely to help, so the best we can do is try and hope for the best. It can sometimes take a little while for patients to notice improvement on LDN, so we typically allow about three months as a trial period before deciding whether to continue treatment.
Depression is a serious mood disorder with symptoms that range from mild to debilitating and potentially life-threatening. Some people look to manage depression with herbal remedies, rather than with medication a doctor prescribes.
The most recent data from the National Institute of Mental Health suggest that in the United States, 6.7 percent of people experienced a major depressive episode in 2016.
Medications and counseling are conventional ways to alleviate the symptoms of depression. However, some herbs and supplements may also help.
In this article, we look at the common herbs and supplements with links to the treatment of depression and discuss their safety and effectiveness.
Herbs and supplements
Some herbs, essential oils, and supplements have shown promising effects for people with depression.
The use of complementary therapies continues to gain popularity, as people look for more natural methods of managing their health.
However, herbal does not always mean safe or effective, and knowing which products to choose can save a lot of time and money.
In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) do not monitor herbs in the same way as food and drugs. As a result, manufacturers are not always 100 percent clear about the quality or purity of their product.
Research suggests promise for some supplements in treating mild-to-moderate depression. These are some of the supplements that people most widely use:
1. St. John’s wort
St. John’s wort is also known as Hypericum perforatum. This plant has been a common herbal mental health treatment for hundreds of years. However, people must use caution if they chose to try it as a potential treatment for depression.
However, this review of eligible studies did not find research on the long-term effects of St. John’s wort on severe depression.
The authors also advised caution against accepting the results wholesale, as the herb has adverse effects that many of the studies did not consider.
St John’s wort can also interfere with the effects of antidepressant medication, meaning that it may make symptoms worse or reduce the effectiveness of conventional treatment.
While St. John’s wort might help some people, it does not show consistently beneficial effects.
For these reasons, people should not use St. John’s wort instead of conventional treatment. Neither should they try St. John’s wort to treat moderate to severe depression.St. John’s Wort: Should I use it?Should I take St. John’s wort? Click here to find out more.READ NOW
This supplement comes from the gnarled root of the American or Asian ginseng plant. Siberian, Asian, and Eleuthero ginseng are different plants with different active ingredients.
Practitioners of Chinese medicine have used ginseng for thousands of years to help people improve mental clarity and energy and reduce the effects of stress.
Some people associate these properties of ginseng with potential solutions for the low energy and motivation that can occur with depression.
However, the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) advise that none of the many studies that people have conducted on ginseng have been of sufficient quality to form health recommendations.
The results show that chamomile produced more significant relief from depressive symptoms than a placebo. However, further studies are necessary to confirm the health benefits of chamomile in treating depressive symptoms.
Lavender oil is a popular essential oil. People typically use lavender oil for relaxation and reducing anxiety and mood disturbances.
A 2013 review of various studies suggested that lavender might have significant potential in reducing anxiety and improving sleep.
Lavender has mixed results in studies that assess its impact on anxiety. However, its effectiveness as a treatment for ongoing depression has little high-quality evidence in support at the current time.
Some studies cite using saffron as a safe and effective measure for controlling the symptoms of depression, such as this non-systematic review from 2018.
However, more research would help confirm the possible benefits of saffron for people with depression. Scientists also need to understand any possible adverse effects better.
Some supplements have shown promising effects on depression symptoms. However, many investigations confirming their benefits are low quality.
SAMe is short for S-adenosyl methionine. It is a synthetic form of a chemical that occurs naturally in the body.
In 2016, researchers reviewed all the randomized controlled trials on record for the use of SAMe to treat depression in adults. They found no significant difference between the effects of SAMe on depression symptoms and those of a placebo.
However, they also found that SAMe had about the same effectiveness as the common antidepressants imipramine or escitalopram. Furthermore, it was better than a placebo when the researchers mixed SAMe with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications.
As with many other studies into herbs and supplements, the investigations into the safety and efficacy of SAMe are of low quality. More research is necessary to determine its exact effect.
People use the supplement in Europe as a prescription antidepressant. However, the FDA have not yet approved this for use in the U.S.
7. Omega-3 fatty acids
While the study authors reported no serious side effects from the supplement, they also advised that it would only be an effective measure in treatment for depression that was due to omega-3 deficiency.
Also known as 5-hydroxytryptophan, this supplement may be useful in regulating and improving levels of serotonin in the brain. Serotonin is the neurotransmitter that affects a person’s mood.
5-HTP has undergone a number of animal studies, and some, such as this review from 2016, cite its potential as an antidepressant therapy. However, evidence of its effects in human subjects is limited.
5-HTP is available as an over-the-counter (OTC) supplement in the U.S. but may require a prescription in other countries.
More research is necessary, especially regarding concerns that it may cause serotonin syndrome, a serious neurological complication if a person takes 5-HTP in excess.
Supplement manufacturers do not have to prove that their product is consistent. The dose on the bottle may also be inaccurate.
People should ensure they purchase herbs and supplements from a trusted manufacturer.
FOODS for Depression:
Important foods and nutrients
The following foods and nutrients may play a role in reducing the symptoms of depression.
Selenium can be a part of reducing symptoms of depression in many people. Low selenium levels have been linked to poor moods.
Selenium can be found in supplement form or a variety of foods, including whole grains, Brazil nuts, and some seafood. Organ meats, such as liver, are also high in selenium.
This vitamin is obtained easily through full body exposure to the sun, and there are also many high-quality supplements on the market that contain vitamin D.
Food sources of vitamin D include fatty fish such as salmon, tuna, and mackerel.
Omega-3 fatty acids
Nuts and seeds are sources of omega fats, which can help treat mood disorders and improve cognitive function.
Good sources of omega-3s may include:
- cold water fish, such as salmon, sardines, tuna, and mackerel
- flaxseed, flaxseed oil, and chia seeds
- nuts, such as walnuts and almonds
The quality of these foods can affect the levels of omega-3s they contain.
Eating omega-3 fatty acids may increase the level of healthful fats available to the brain, preserve the myelin sheath that protects nerve cells, and keep the brain working at the highest level. In turn, this can reduce the risk of mood disorders and brain diseases occurring.
Antioxidants have become popular as they fight free radicals. Free radicals are damaged molecules that can build up in different cells in the body and cause problems, such as inflammation, premature aging, and cell death.
The brain may be more prone to this type of damage than other areas of the body. As a result, it needs a good way to get rid of these free radicals and avoid problems. Foods rich in antioxidants are believed to help reduce or reverse the damage caused by free radicals.
Everyday antioxidants found in a variety of whole foods include:
- vitamin E
- vitamin C
- vitamin A (beta-carotene)
These nutrients may help reduce stress-related symptoms of psychiatric disorders.
Sources of B vitamins include:
- whole grains
Fortified cereals may also contain vitamins B12 and folate. Other foods that have folate in them include:
- dark leafy vegetables
- fruit and fruit juices
- whole grains
- dairy products
- meat and poultry
Eating a varied diet is an easy way to ensure there is enough folate in the diet.
Zinc helps the body perceive taste, boosts the immune system, and may also influence depression. Zinc levels may be lower in people with clinical depression, and zinc supplementation may also improve the effectiveness of antidepressants.
Zinc is found in supplements. Foods, including whole grains, oysters, beans, and nuts, are also good sources of zinc.
High-quality proteins are the building blocks of life. Getting adequate protein is essential for everyone, but some forms of protein, in particular, may be more helpful for people with depression.
Serotonin deficiency was once thought to be a major cause of depression. We now know that the link between serotonin and depression is very complex, but it does seem to influence depression in many people. Including foods rich in tryptophan in a diet may help relieve symptoms.
Foods to avoid
Just as certain foods and nutrients may be of benefit to people with depression, there are also some that should be avoided.
For people with depression that is linked to anxiety, it may be important to avoid caffeine. Caffeine can make it difficult to sleep and may trigger symptoms of anxiety in many people.
Caffeine also affects the system for hours after it is consumed. It is best for people with depression to avoid caffeine if possible, or reduce consumption and stop consuming it after noon.
Though occasional alcohol drinking is seen as an acceptable distraction, it may make depression symptoms worse.
Excessive alcohol consumption may increase the risk of panic attacks or depressed episodes. Alcohol also alters a person’s mood and may turn into a habit, which could influence depression symptoms.
High-calorie foods with few nutrients in them may also influence depression symptoms. Foods high in sugar and refined carbs can promote a crash, as the energy from them is depleted. This can make a person feel mood swings or energy swings.
Nutrient-dense whole foods are a much better approach to balancing mood and energy levels.
Highly processed or refined oils, such as safflower and corn oil, are very high in omega-6 fatty acids. Having too many omega-6s in the diet can cause an imbalance in the body that may promote inflammation in the brain and influence depression symptoms.
Other factors in depression
Regular physical activity and spending time outdoors are proven ways to help improve the symptoms of depression.
There are other factors that link to both diet and depression and play a role in this mental healthillness.
Emerging research has shown gut bacteria to play an integral role in major mood disorders, including depression and bipolar disease. A 2016 meta-analysis reported that probiotics, in both supplement form and in fermented foods such as yogurt and kefir, resulted in significant reductions in depression.
More research is needed to identify the therapeutic value of specific strains, but so far Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium show potential.
Obese people may be more likely to be depressed, and depressed people are more likely to become obese. This may be due to hormone changes and immune system imbalances that come with depression.
Spending time outdoors and at least 150 minutes of physical activity weekly have been shown to improve mood and depressive symptoms.
Some people with depression also have substance abuse problems. Alcohol or other drugs can interfere with sleep patterns, decrease motivation, and alter a person’s mood.
Sleep may also play a role in depression. The body’s natural sleep cycle creates mood-altering chemicals to match the time of day. Altering this natural cycle may affect how well the body can use these chemicals.
Most adults respond well when they get 7 to 8 hours of sleep, though the number varies from person to person. It may also help to reduce exposure to blue light, during the hours leading up to sleep. Blue light is emitted by electronic devices and low-energy light bulbs.
LDN for psychiatric disorders:
When I have to describe my patient population, I often say that “my patients are normal people with some problems.” A significant number of my patients also have a chronic medical illness, such as an autoimmune disorder. Since I added it to my prescribing armamentarium many years ago, LDN has become a frequently used tool that I offer to my patients along with the other therapeutic strategies.
…LDN has become a frequently used tool that I offer to my patients along with the other therapeutic strategies.
For what kinds of conditions do you prescribe LDN?
In my practice, I use LDN for these conditions because I see it work:
- Some subtypes of depression (subtypes that seem to be triggered by inflammation, seasonal type, postpartum, or related to deficiency of dopamine or endorphins);
- Some subtypes of anxiety (for example, that come with obsessive ruminations or intrusive thoughts);
- Obsessive-compulsive disorder and OCD-spectrum disorders;
- Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD);
- Modulation of sleep architecture;
- A variety of sexual problems, including problems of desire, performance and satisfaction;
- What I call “LDN assisted psychotherapy”. (I think I found how to use it to help extinguish unwanted behaviors and reinforce wanted alternative behaviors. This work is done with therapists I teach and then collaborate with);
- Appetite control;
- Addiction to internet, sex, gambling;
- Alcohol and drug dependence. (While we probably need a “traditional dose” of naltrexone for treatment of alcohol dependence, some other types are doing great on LDN);
- Helping patients stop opioids and then recover quicker from the prolonged post-opioid use problems, or just decreasing the amount of pain pills they are taking.
You mention prescribing LDN for certain subtypes of depression/anxiety. What subtypes are you referring to?
In my opinion, depression is not a single disorder. It is rather a generic name that was chosen to describe a number of diverse conditions, just because they share a few common symptoms. There were many attempts in academic psychiatry to separate the clearly heterogeneous group of disorders collectively called “depression” into subtypes. Unfortunately, for a long time, this work had no impetus, as most of the medications that came to market during the last 20-30 years were inspired by the same theory – that depression is related to the imbalance in one or more principal neurotransmitters in the brain – serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine. In my view, in the nearest future, we will see that new medications will seek approval to treat specific symptoms of depression, such as sadness, racing thoughts, obsessive ruminations and changes in energy, rather than for the generic indication “depression”.Which subtypes of depression are more responsive to LDN?
Although not always, patients whose depression comes with tiredness, inability to feel any excitement, no motivation, no enthusiasm, slowed movements and thinking, decreased appetite, etc. are more likely to respond to LDN. This is compared to patients who describe their depression as “painful”, who feel discontent, antsy, and/or pessimistic. There are no strict rules; some of the depression types can overlap in their symptoms. I also want to add that it is very uncommon for LDN to worsen depression.
Although not always, patients whose depression comes with tiredness, inability to feel any excitement, no motivation, no enthusiasm, slowed movements and thinking, decreased appetite, etc. are more likely to respond to LDN.
What effects did you see LDN providing?
Since the majority of my patients are already taking at least a few, if not more, medications, I do not have a luxury to stop all their medications suddenly and switch them only to LDN. I usually start by adding LDN, along with making some other changes to the cocktail of their medications. I can only say that the result of adding LDN is sometimes spectacular and sometimes there is no obvious change.In your experience, who can benefit from LDN?
LDN works on opioid receptors. Everybody who has opioid receptors can benefit from LDN. Although at this point there are no recommendations to take LDN prophylactically, knowing how much LDN can do, and how many autoimmune conditions remain undetected for long time, a trial of LDN is probably warranted for most of the cases of “vague symptoms”, for the cases of incomplete resolution of an illness, etc.What do you advise your patients about the timing of taking their LDN?
In psychiatry, we frequently adjust dosages and schedules. Of course, I am aware of the traditional way to take low dose naltrexone before bed and I always recommend that patients start taking it this way. If, however, we do not get a desirable result – and, in the case of psychiatry, the patient, not the lab value is the best judge of the result – the dosage can be changed or the timing can be changed. I have patients who take LDN once a day and others who sip an LDN solution throughout the day. In some cases of addiction, or if my goal is to modify an unwanted behavior, I might instruct the patient to take naltrexone every time they think they might find themselves engaged in the behavior they want to extinguish.Have you observed long-term effects of LDN yet?
As far as I understand, there is no official information related to the long term use of LDN. A lot of patients feel that they “returned back to step one” when they stopped taking LDN. Because of this, especially taking in consideration practically negligible side effects, the risk-benefit ratio of LDN is clearly supporting long-term use. Even when I treat illnesses with episodic courses, such as depression, I still recommend that patients continue taking LDN because of the high risk of recurrence. On the other hand, I had patients who felt strongly about stopping all medications as soon as they improved; it made no sense, but they had strong philosophical disagreement with taking any medications in general. In their cases, I just made sure that they have a strategic supply of LDN which can be started when the next episode begins. Unfortunately, this kind of patient is not always able to catch the first signs of the illness and start the treatment before it becomes severe.
…especially taking in consideration practically negligible side effects, the risk-benefit ratio of LDN is clearly supporting long-term use.
Do you think there is a risk of receptors becoming adjusted to LDN and creating the potential for either tolerance or addiction to it?
Some of my patients who say, “If I forget to take my LDN, I feel it” wonder the same. They feel they are “missing something”, and they might become more irritable, tired, have difficulty concentrating, and complain of “brain fog”. This makes sense because LDN works on the opioid receptors, after all. At the same time, I do not know a case when a patient could not stop LDN or had unbearable withdrawal, even after a prolonged use. Based on what I understand now, this “dependence” on LDN does not look like dependence to opioids or benzodiazepines (Xanax®, Ativan®, Valium®, etc.). It looks more like dependence to coffee. Some people who drink coffee every day and stop abruptly also complain of withdrawals – they have no energy, no concentration, they start having headaches, etc. These symptoms, however, are more of a nuisance than a tragedy. As a rule, they subside in a few days. Based on what I know now and what I read, I would not stop LDN because of the fear of dependence.
…I do not know a case when a patient could not stop LDN or had unbearable withdrawal, even after a prolonged use.
Have you seen any side effects from LDN?
The patients I treat are probably more vulnerable to vivid dreams and their dreams might become unpleasant. Additionally, after a couple of surprises, I do not forget to tell my female patients to be more careful about pregnancy precautions, because they might become unexpectedly more fertile.What kind of research on LDN for sexual dysfunction are you interested in?
There is a tight connection between autoimmune conditions and hormone imbalance; there is even an opinion that autoimmune conditions are caused by hormone imbalance. Sexual dysfunctions (not only disorders of performance, but also disorders of desire and satisfaction) are only a small part of the consequences of the hormone imbalance. My most recent project is focusing on post-coital dysphoria or “post-sex blues”. Basically, it describes a phenomenon when people become dysphoric (tearful, depressed, or, possibly, argumentative) after they have an orgasm, even though they had satisfying sex with a person they loved. The phenomenon is most likely related to the skyrocketing and then sudden dropping of the dopamine level. The mechanism is somewhat similar to the crash following cocaine use. A few years ago, I came up with the idea of using LDN prior to sex to normalize this dopamine/endorphin response. In essence, taking LDN prior to sex can fix the problem, and the only question left is the timing and the amount of LDN.
In essence, taking LDN prior to sex can fix the problem, and the only question left is the timing and the amount of LDN.
What dose and timing do you recommend for this kind of sexual dysfunction condition?
In practice, I recommend LDN as a part of a stimulant-vitamin-drug combination. At this point, I need a little more data to announce the magic combination, dose and timing. I would like to invite the readers, whether you are on LDN currently or not, openly or anonymously, to share your experience about using LDN for this condition.
LDN can → ↑ BDNF as well as: exercise caloric restriction glutamate, cucurmin
To boost endorphins, use LDN with: ● high-protein food ● vitamins: B, C, Omega-3 with vit D, E, Zink; ● avoiding sugar, flour, coffee – (“exorphins”) ● exercise, massage, acupuncture, sunlight ● guided imagery, music, romance, nature
BDNF – norbuprenorphine, kratom, cannabidiol (Epidiolex), THC (Marinol) – inhibited by trazodone, buprenorphine
Naltrexone is a medication that can be used for the treatment of opioid violations and alcohol addiction. The research that was conducted in order to study the action of this drug showed that naltrexone can also be taken within the patients suffering from severe depression.
As a result of the research, it was found that taking the drug naltrexone can help to reduce depression. The patients participating in the research were people, who had depression and took antidepressants. It was set up that the severity of depression was reduced within the patients taking naltrexone. The results of the research were published in the Journal of Affective Disorders in January 2017.
The author of this study was David Mischoulon, a medical specialist of the Massachusetts Hospital and one of the specialists of the Harvard Medical School. He was the leader of the group that studied a variety of ways to treat severe depression. The group studied the action mechanism and the effect of antidepressant medications, as well as the mechanisms that contribute to the development of depression. Initially, the LDN drug was patented as the drug indicated for the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS), but during the treatment of patients with RLS taking LDN, it was found that LDN also positively affects suppression of depression.
One of the mechanisms of the low dose naltrexone medication is dopamine. It is a neurotransmitter, which is associated with the regulation of human mood and helps to reduce depression.
The studies, connected with LDN, have also shown that if a patient suffers from depression and takes antidepressants that work with dopaminergic mechanisms, the additional use of LDN in combination with the antidepressant drugs can help to cope with depression in a shorter period of time.
There was also a disadvantage of the research. It is connected with the fact that there were just 12 patients who participated in the study. This number of the participants is too small to make exact conclusions, concerning the LDN action mechanisms and taking it in order to treat depression. To be sure about the action of this drug during treating depression, more studies should be done, involving larger groups of participants. In the study described above, the patients used just the antidepressants, acting through dopaminergic mechanisms. This fact does not give any confidence that LDN will act positively in combination with other antidepressants, for example, with serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants.
Moreover, it would be useful to conduct an optimal LDN study, as the LDN medication includes a number of different dosages and they are all defined as low doses. Such a study has not previously been conducted. Therefore, some medical specialists who prescribe LDN should inform their patients about this drug and warn the patients that the therapy associated with LDN while treating depression is experimental. The patients should be aware of the potential risks before taking this medication, as the drug is not accepted in medicine, regarding the treatment of depression.
LDN can’t be bought at most pharmacies, although it can be obtained by prescription from a licensed doctor. The commercially available forms of naltrexone come in much higher doses. To get LDN, you need to bring a prescription from your doctor to the pharmacy and there the appropriate dosage form will be prepared for you. In general, LDN is available for the majority of people.
Ketamine has rapid and robust antidepressant effects. However, there are concerns about the abuse liability of ketamine.1This concern was heightened recently owing to a preliminary report suggesting that antidepressant effects of ketamine might be dependent on opiate receptor stimulation.2 Below, we present pilot data that indicate that the antidepressant effects of ketamine are not attenuated by naltrexone pretreatment. As a result, the combination of opiate receptor antagonism with ketamine might be a strategy to reduce addiction risk among patients with depression at risk for substance abuse.Methods
We recruited and obtained written informed consent from 5 patients with current major depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder. In this 8-week open-label pilot study, which recieved institutional review board approval by the VA Connecticut Healthcare System Human Subjects Subcommittee, patients received injectable naltrexone (380 mg once 2-6 days prior to the first ketamine infusion) and repeated intravenous ketamine treatment (0.5 mg/kg once a week for 4 weeks; a total of 4 ketamine infusions). The study had 2 phases: (1) a 4-week ketamine treatment phase and (2) a 4-week follow-up phase. All patients were abstinent from alcohol for 5 days or longer prior to the first ketamine infusion. The primary outcome measure was clinical response defined as a 50% or higher improvement from baseline in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores at 4 hours postinfusion.Results
The combination of naltrexone and ketamine was associated with reduced depressive symptoms. The Figure shows that 60% (3 of 5) of patients met response criteria after their initial ketamine dose and 100% (5 of 5) met response criteria by their fourth dose, although 1 patient left the trial after receiving 2 ketamine infusions. The Table shows that depressive symptoms improved about 57% to 92%. Also, 80% (4 of 5) of patients reported improvement in alcohol craving and consumption as measured by the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale. The combination treatment was safe and well tolerated in all participants. No serious adverse effects were reported in the trial.Discussion
Our pilot data suggest that naltrexone pretreatment did not interfere with the antidepressant effects of ketamine and might enhance the treatment of comorbid alcohol use disorder. This result conflicts with that reported by Williams et al2 in which pretreatment with 50 mg of naltrexone reduced the rate of clinical response to ketamine from 71% (5 of 7 individuals) to 0% (0 of 7 individuals). Their data and an editorial by George,3 although preliminary, make a case for a central role for opiate agonism in the antidepressant effects of ketamine. Although our pilot data were collected under somewhat different conditions than those of Williams et al2 (eg, different primary outcome time of 4 hours vs 1 day postinfusion, presence vs absence of alcohol use disorder, injectable vs oral naltrexone), they do not support the hypothesis that opiate receptor stimulation mediates the antidepressant effects of ketamine. Since Williams et al2 did not provide depression ratings over a 4-hour period postinfusion, we cannot examine whether 50 mg of oral naltrexone blunted ketamine response in this early 4-hour period. Our findings are consistent with an earlier study in healthy individuals showing that the behavioral effects of an antidepressant dose of ketamine were not altered by pretreatment with 25 mg of naltrexone,4 and some preclinical evidence that ketamine isomers may be weak partial agonists at μ opiate receptors.5
The initial report by Williams et al2 and our preliminary data should be interpreted with great caution. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to better understand whether opiate receptor stimulation contributes to the antidepressant effects of ketamine. If so, then preclinical research will be needed to help us to understand this role for opiates and its implications for future rapid-acting antidepressant treatments.
This therapeutic approach is “incredibly unique” and is safe and effective in some patients with intractable pain. “If you put these two together, you could replace any short-acting opiate,” Caron Pedersen, FNP-C, DC, BSN, BS-PT, a nurse practitioner, chiropractor, and physical therapist specializing in patients with spinal pain, told Medscape Medical News.
Dr Caron Pedersen
Dr Pedersen has been working with pain management expert, Forest Tennant, MD, DPH, Veract Intractable Pain Clinic, West Covina, California, to find better ways to treat patients with very severe pain.
Such patients, said Dr Pedersen, “are pretty much opioid-dependent and have been for long time, and are not getting relief.”
Dr Pedersen presented some of her research here at the Academy of Integrative Pain Management (AIPM) 28th Annual Meeting.
Alternative to Opioids?
A variety of antiseizure, antidepressant, and anti-inflammatory agents, as well as muscle relaxants and adrenergic blocking agents, provide mild to moderate pain relief. But these approaches are not always a substitute for opioids in patients with severe pain.
Both oxytocin and ketamine provide analgesia by mechanisms other than stimulating opioid receptors.
Produced in the hypothalamus, oxytocin is a potent natural pain reliever. The hormone is released in pregnant women during labor and also in other painful conditions or stressful events.
It has been reported to relieve pain in patients with headache, chronic back pain, and fibromyalgia, and there is “a mountain of research” on oxytocin’s complex production, release, and receptor system, said Dr Pedersen.
Dr Tennant explained that some of the hormone is released into the peripheral circulation via the posterior pituitary and some into the central nervous system, including the spinal fluid.
Oxytocin receptors are found at multiple sites in the brain and throughout the spinal cord, said Dr Tennant. In addition to activating its own receptors and decreasing pain signals, oxytocin binds to opioid receptors and stimulates endogenous opioid release in the brain.
In addition to relieving pain, oxytocin lowers serum cortisol and can produce a calming effect and improve mood.
“It has the effect of making people happy, making them feel a little less anxious,” said Dr Pedersen. “It changes the central nervous system; it makes the hypothalamus pump out chemicals that are telling the body it’s okay, calm down.”
Oxytocin can block “anticipatory pain,” added Dr Pedersen. Patients with intractable pain are constantly waiting for “the next burse of pain” so are “in constant stress,” she said.
However, when they take oxytocin, “they may actually get a lot of relief based on the fact that they are no longer having that anticipation.”
Pain Free, No Side Effects
The investigators are working to determine optimal doses and routes of administration for oxytocin. They have experimented with combining oxytocin with low-dose naltrexone, benzodiazepines, neuropathic agents, opioids, and now ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonist.
There has been a resurgence of interest in ketamine as a possible therapy for chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain, complex regional pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, postherpetic neuralgia, migraines, and spinal cord injury.
At relatively high doses, ketamine has significant psychomimetic and euphoric properties that have led to abuse. Oral ketamine, sometimes called Special K, has become a popular nightclub drug.
Dr Tennant and Dr Pedersen have been experimenting with low-dose ketamine added to oxytocin in patients with the most severe intractable pain.
Patients had not taken their short-acting opiate for several hours when they received 0.5 mL (2 mg — half of a syringe, or 20 units) of liquid oxytocin sublingually. Within 10 minutes, all five patients reported varying degrees of pain relief.
About 15 minutes after receiving the oxytocin, patients then received 0.25 to 0.50 mL (12.5 to 25 mg) of liquid ketamine, also sublingually.
The ketamine enhanced the pain relief. With the combination, two patients became completely pain free. These patients would “positively not” have been pain free with opioids, said Dr Pedersen.
The pain relief lasted about 4 hours with no side effects.
The Worst of the Worst
Dr Pedersen said the study patients were “the very worst” of pain patients. In her clinic, many patients suffer intractable pain — pain that never completely goes away with surgery or with drugs. “Some have had, say, seven or eight back surgeries and they have so much inflammation in their spine.”
Some are battling an autoimmune disease, such as lupus. Others have arachnoiditis, an incurable inflammatory condition of the arachnoid mater, the middle layer of the meninges.
Because oxytocin is a hormone, its pain-relieving ability varies from patient to patient and its effectiveness is related, among other things, to blood levels, pain severity, and sex.
In her experience, Dr Pedersen has found that men tend to have a better response to the combination of oxytocin and ketamine than women.
But women also respond “fabulously,” she said. She described one 38-year-old female patient in her practice with a disc herniation who had been taking opioids, which were not helping her much. “She stopped taking them when she started using this combination therapy.”
Other patients have been able to cut back on opioids “significantly enough that if they had to stop taking them, they would be okay,” said Dr Pedersen.
The combination therapy may also address the issue of addiction, said Dr Pedersen. Some of her patients had become addicted to opioids, but after using the oxytocin-ketamine regimen, they’re not craving or abusing opioids.
The liquid form taken sublingually provides “the best delivery system” and is much more effective than pills, said Dr Pedersen.
Although liquid oxytocin typically has a shelf life of only about 10 days, Dr Pedersen has found pharmacies that put the hormone in a suspension that lasts for 3 months.
Commenting on the research for Medscape Medical News, Charles E. Argoff, MD, professor of neurology, and director, Comprehensive Pain Center, Albany Medical College, New York, said it “provides intriguing results.”
However, he said, a single-center open-label study of only five patients “is insufficient to draw any conclusions.”
While the use of oxytocin as an analgesic is supported by basic science, “this study does not add significantly to the human studies already completed, given its size and design,” said Dr Argoff.
Adding ketamine “dampens enthusiasm” for this therapeutic approach because of concerns about dependency and side effects, said Dr Argoff.
Adverse effects of ketamine can include nausea, headaches, fatigue, and dysphoria.
The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Academy of Integrative Pain Management (AIPM) 28th Annual Meeting. Abstract 24. Presented October 21, 2017.
Metformin & Pain
Metformin “can lead to a long-lasting reversal of pain hypersensitivity even long after treatment cessation, indicative of disease modification.” [ref below]
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics , from Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
This is a very rare condition that has no known treatment.
In this case report, we describe a patient with Dercum’s disease who was successfully managed with metformin. The administration of metformin reduced pain intensity from 9/10 to 3/10 and favorably affected the profile of inflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNF a, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10), adipokines (i.e., adiponectin, leptin, and resistin), and β-endorphin. Because each variable was affected moderately by the drug, in the range of 20 – 30%, it follows that these effects are additive, i.e., they act independently of each other. However, taking into account advances in the pharmacology of metformin, it seems that other phenomena, such as modulation of synaptic plasticity, activation of microglia, and autophagy of the afferents supplying painful lipomas should be taken into consideration. Nonetheless, metformin deserves further exploration in the biology of pain.
Journal of pain , from University of Arizona Tucson, Ted Price’s lab, and USC
Lumbar radiculopathy pain represents a major public health problem, with few effective long-term treatments. Preclinical neuropathic and postsurgical pain studies implicate the kinase adenosine monophosphate activated kinase (AMPK) as a potential pharmacological target for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Metformin, which acts via AMPK, is a safe and clinically available drug used in the treatment of diabetes. Despite the strong preclinical rationale, the utility of metformin as a potential pain therapeutic has not yet been studied in humans. Our objective was to assess whether metformin is associated with decreased lumbar radiculopathy pain, in a retrospective chart review. We completed a retrospective chart review of patients who sought care from a university pain specialist for lumbar radiculopathy between 2008 and 2011. Patients on metformin at the time of visit to a university pain specialist were compared with patients who were not on metformin. We compared the pain outcomes in 46 patients on metformin and 94 patients not taking metformin therapy. The major finding was that metformin use was associated with a decrease in the mean of “pain now,” by −1.85 (confidence interval: −3.6 to −0.08) on a 0–10 visual analog scale, using a matched propensity scoring analysis and confirmed using a Bayesian analysis, with a significant mean decrease of −1.36 (credible interval: −2.6 to −0.03). Additionally, patients on metformin showed a non-statistically significant trend toward decreased pain on a variety of other pain descriptors. Our proof-of-concept findings suggest that metformin use is associated with a decrease in lumbar radiculopathy pain, providing a rational for larger retrospective trials in different pain populations and for prospective trials, to test the effectiveness of metformin in reducing neuropathic pain.
The anti-diabetic drug metformin protects against chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in a mouse model.
PLoS One  from MD Anderson Cancer Center
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) characterized by loss of sensory sensitivity and pain in hands and feet is the major dose-limiting toxicity of many chemotherapeutics. At present, there are no FDA-approved treatments for CIPN. The anti-diabetic drug metformin is the most widely used prescription drug in the world and improves glycemic control in diabetes patients. There is some evidence that metformin enhances the efficacy of cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that metforminprotects against chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain and sensory deficits. Mice were treated with cisplatin together with metformin or saline. Cisplatin induced increased sensitivity to mechanical stimulation (mechanical allodynia) as measured using the von Frey test. Co-administration of metformin almost completely prevented the cisplatin-induced mechanical allodynia. Co-administration of metformin also prevented paclitaxel-induced mechanical allodynia. The capacity of the mice to detect an adhesive patch on their hind paw was used as a novel indicator of chemotherapy-induced sensory deficits. Co-administration of metformin prevented the cisplatin-induced increase in latency to detect the adhesive patch indicating that metformin prevents sensory deficits as well. Moreover, metformin prevented the reduction in density of intra-epidermal nerve fibers (IENFs) in the paw that develops as a result of cisplatin treatment. We conclude that metformin protects against pain and loss of tactile function in a mouse model of CIPN. The finding that metformin reduces loss of peripheral nerve endings indicates that mechanism underlying the beneficial effects of metformin includes a neuroprotective activity. Because metformin is widely used for treatment of type II diabetes, has a broad safety profile, and is currently being tested as an adjuvant drug in cancer treatment, clinical translation of these findings could be rapidly achieved.
Proteomic and functional annotation analysis of injured peripheral nerves reveals ApoE as a protein upregulated by injury that is modulated by metformin treatment
from Mol Pain , from University of Arizona
Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) results in a fundamental reorganization of the translational machinery in the injured peripheral nerve such that protein synthesis is increased in a manner linked to enhanced mTOR and ERK activity. We have shown that metformin treatment, which activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), reverses tactile allodynia and enhanced translation following PNI. To gain a better understanding of how PNI changes the proteome of the sciatic nerve and ascertain how metformin treatment may cause further change, we conducted a range of unbiased proteomic studies followed by biochemical experiments to confirm key results.
These proteomic findings support the hypothesis that PNI leads to a fundamental reorganization of gene expression within the injured nerve. Our data identify a key association of ApoE with PNI that is regulated by metformin treatment. We conclude from the known functions of ApoE in the nervous system that ApoE may be an intrinsic factor linked to nerve regeneration after PNI, an effect that is further enhanced by metformin treatment.
Volume 107 of the series Experientia Supplementum  from University of Texas Dallas
Chronic pain is a major clinical problem that is poorly treated with available therapeutics. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) has recently emerged as a novel target for the treatment of pain with the exciting potential for disease modification. AMPK activators inhibit signaling pathways that are known to promote changes in the function and phenotype of peripheral nociceptive neurons and promote chronic pain. AMPK activators also reduce the excitability of these cells suggesting that AMPK activators may be efficacious for the treatment of chronic pain disorders, like neuropathic pain, where changes in the excitability of nociceptors is thought to be an underlying cause. In agreement with this, AMPK activators have now been shown to alleviate pain in a broad variety of preclinical pain models indicating that this mechanism might be engaged for the treatment of many types of pain in the clinic. A key feature of the effect of AMPK activators in these models is that they can lead to a long-lasting reversal of pain hypersensitivity even long after treatment cessation, indicative of disease modification. Here, we review the evidence supporting AMPK as a novel pain target pointing out opportunities for further discovery that are likely to have an impact on drug discovery efforts centered around potent and specific allosteric activators of AMPK for chronic pain treatment.
Targeting adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in preclinical models reveals a potential mechanism for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Mol Pain  from University of Arizona
Neuropathic pain is a debilitating clinical condition with few efficacious treatments, warranting development of novel therapeutics. We hypothesized that dysregulated translation regulation pathways may underlie neuropathic pain. Peripheral nerve injury induced reorganization of translation machinery in the peripheral nervous system of rats and mice, including enhanced mTOR and ERK activity, increased phosphorylation of mTOR and ERK downstream targets, augmented eIF4F complex formation and enhanced nascent protein synthesis. The AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) activators, metformin and A769662, inhibited translation regulation signaling pathways, eIF4F complex formation, nascent protein synthesis in injured nerves and sodium channel-dependent excitability of sensory neurons resulting in a resolution of neuropathic allodynia. Therefore, injury-induced dysregulation of translation control underlies pathology leading to neuropathic pain and reveals AMPK as a novel therapeutic target for the potential treatment of neuropathic pain.
Contrasting effects of chronic, systemic treatment with mTOR inhibitors rapamycin and metformin on adult neural progenitors in mice.
The chronic and systemic administration of rapamycin extends life span in mammals. Rapamycin is a pharmacological inhibitor of mTOR. Metformin also inhibits mTOR signaling but by activating the upstream kinase AMPK. Here we report the effects of chronic and systemic administration of the two mTOR inhibitors, rapamycin and metformin, on adult neural stem cells of the subventricular region and the dendate gyrus of the mouse hippocampus. While rapamycin decreased the number of neural progenitors, metformin-mediated inhibition of mTOR had no such effect. Adult-born neurons are considered important for cognitive and behavioral health, and may contribute to improved health span. Our results demonstrate that distinct approaches of inhibiting mTOR signaling can have significantly different effects on organ function. These results underscore the importance of screening individual mTOR inhibitors on different organs and physiological processes for potential adverse effects that may compromise health span.
Two Weeks of Metformin Treatment Enhances Mitochondrial Respiration in Skeletal Muscle of AMPK Kinase Dead but Not Wild Type Mice
.PLoS One from University of Copenhagen .
Metformin is used as an anti-diabetic drug. Metformin ameliorates insulin resistance by improving insulin sensitivity in liver and skeletal muscle. Reduced mitochondrial content has been reported in type 2 diabetic muscles and it may contribute to decreased insulin sensitivity characteristic for diabetic muscles. The molecular mechanism behind the effect of metformin is not fully clarified but inhibition of complex I in the mitochondria and also activation of the 5′AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) has been reported in muscle. Furthermore, both AMPK activation and metformin treatment have been associated with stimulation of mitochondrial function and biogenesis. However, a causal relationship in skeletal muscle has not been investigated. We hypothesized that potential effects of in vivo metformin treatment on mitochondrial function and protein expressions in skeletal muscle are dependent upon AMPK signaling. We investigated this by two weeks of oral metformin treatment of muscle specific kinase dead α2 (KD) AMPK mice and wild type (WT) littermates. We measured mitochondrial respiration and protein activity and expressions of key enzymes involved in mitochondrial carbohydrate and fat metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation. Mitochondrial respiration, HAD and CS activity, PDH and complex I-V and cytochrome c protein expression were all reduced in AMPK KD compared to WT tibialis anterior muscles. Surprisingly, metformin treatment only enhanced respiration in AMPK KD mice and thereby rescued the respiration defect compared to the WT mice. Metformin did not influence protein activities or expressions in either WT or AMPK KD mice.
We conclude that two weeks of in vivo metformin treatment enhances mitochondrial respiration in the mitochondrial deficient AMPK KD but not WT mice. The improvement seems to be unrelated to AMPK, and does not involve changes in key mitochondrial proteins.
Effects of metformin on microvascular function and exercise tolerance in women with angina and normal coronary arteries
Journal of the American College of Cardiology , from University of Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre
We conducted an 8-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of metformin 500 mg twice a day in 33 women with a prior history of normal coronary angiography but 2 consecutive positive (ST-segment depression ≥1 mm) exercise tolerance tests.Women randomized to metformin (n = 16) showed significant improvements in endothelium-dependent microvascular function (p < 0.0001) and maximal ST-segment depression (p = 0.013), and a trend (p = 0.056) toward reductions in chest pain incidence relative to placebo recipients. Hence, metformin may improve vascular function and decrease myocardial ischemia in nondiabetic women with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Larger controlled trials of longer duration are warranted.
The material on this site is for informational purposes only.
It is not legal for me to provide medical advice without an examination.
It is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.
This site is not for email and not for appointments.
If you wish an appointment, please telephone the office to schedule.
For My Home Page, click here: Welcome to my Weblog on Pain Management!
Please IGNORE THE ADS BELOW. They are not from me.
Posted in AMPK agonist, Angina in Women, Anti-iinflammatory, Chemotherapy induced neuropathy, Chronic Pain, Metformin, Microvascular, Mitochondrial respiration, mTOR, Neuropathy, Sciatica, Uncategorized. Tags: AMPK agonist, Angina in Women, Anti-inflammatory, Chemotherapy induced neuropathy, Chronic Pain, Metformin, Microvascular, Mitochondrial respiration, mTOR, Peripheral Neuropathy, Sciatica. Leave a Comment »
Metformin Targets Aging – no lactic acidosis, no significant hypoglycemia in 18,000 patients-years of follow-up
03/15/2017 — Nancy Sajben MD Rate This
Authors Nir Barzilai, Jill P. Crandall, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, and Mark A. Espeland from aging research centers at Albert Einstein Medical School and Wake Forest Medical School, Cell Metabolism June 2016
….in 2012, when over 18,000 patients-years of follow-up had accrued, and by which time 20% of the cohort was age 70 or older (mean age 64). There were no cases of lactic acidosis or significant hypoglycemia (Diabetes Prevention Pro- gram Research Group, 2012). Mild anemia occurred in 12% of metformin-treated participants versus 8% in the placebo group (p = 0.04). Vitamin B12 deficiency occurred in 7% of metformin group versus 5% in placebo group after 13 years; risk of B12 deficiency increases with duration of use but was not greater in older compared with younger subjects in DPPOS (Lalau et al., 1990). Further, the risk of lactic acidosis appears to be related to renal function, not age per se, and is currently considered to be very low (Aroda et al., 2016).
B12 deficiency is related to MTHFR. I prescribe the doses of B vitamins to take daily, as published by University of Oxford for seniors. Their work shows it prevents 90% of brain atrophy in those areas that are known to involve Alzheimers Disease [avoid toxic B6 doses that damage brain].
When time permits, I will be adding more on metformin.
If low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) occurs, juice works quickly but rapidly disappears and then blood sugar is low again in minutes. Use good diet practices, and use plenty of small protein snacks if needed. Protein lasts longer and does not trigger sugar spikes like juice.
Common side effects, if present at all, are mostly GI such as diarrhea, nausea, gas, distension of the belly with discomfort, indigestion, anorexia, headache, asthenia. If present, stop the drug, wait till all resolve, and very slowly, increase only as tolerated. This is not a speed test.
Lactic Acidosis potential rare side effect
The potentially serious side effect of concern is lactic acidosis. I advise patients to review its list of potential side effects.
What are the symptoms of lactic acidosis?
Symptoms of lactic acidosis may include nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, weakness, rapid breathing, rapid heart rate or irregular heart rhythm, and mental status changes.
Common symptoms of lactic acidosis
If you experience lactic acidosis, it may be accompanied by symptoms that include:
Irregular heart rate (arrhythmia)
Nausea with or without vomiting
Rapid breathing (tachypnea)
Rapid heart rate (tachycardia)
Shortness of breath
Serious symptoms that might indicate a life-threatening condition
In some cases, lactic acidosis can be life threatening.
Seek immediate medical care (call 911) if you, or someone you are with, have any of these life-threatening symptoms including:
Bluish coloration of the lips or fingernails
Change in level of consciousness or alertness, such as passing out or unresponsiveness
Chest pain, chest tightness, chest pressure, palpitations
High fever (higher than 101 degrees Fahrenheit)
Not producing any urine, or an infant who does not produce the usual amount of wet diapers
Rapid heart rate (tachycardia)
Respiratory or breathing problems, such as shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, labored breathing, rapid breathing, or not breathing
Severe abdominal pain
The material on this site is for informational purposes only.
It is not legal for me to provide medical advice without an examination.
It is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.
This site is not for email and not for appointments.
If you wish an appointment, please telephone the office to schedule.
For My Home Page, click here: Welcome to my Weblog on Pain Management!
Please IGNORE THE ADS BELOW. They are not from me.
03/06/2017 — Nancy Sajben MD 2 Votes
Is metformin the new wonder pill or snake oil? Based on one man’s response to metformin and recent exciting research on the drug, I am looking forward to finding out how it works clinically for my patients with intractable pain (and possibly treatment resistant depression). Hopefully most will confirm it is well tolerated. I am just beginning to trial it after learning this one man’s amazing story:
50% relief of nerve pain &
after 2nd week on metformin
One Man’s Story
A few days ago I spoke with a man, not my patient, who had 50% relief of pain after the second week on metformin. He’s taken it for 3 months now, but the big change came dramatically after the second week when he had been on the 2,000 mg dose a full week. In 2013, he was on the side of the freeway median lane, and had crawled into the engine of his disabled Ford F350 reaching in with his left hand when his vehicle was hit by a Lexus SUV going 70 mph and he was thrown. He doesn’t talk about his pain. Ever. He needs total knee replacement in the next few weeks, and has had four surgeries on his left wrist, mangled in that engine, now with a long steel plate in the wrist. He broke the titanium plate and it wasn’t healing. Since metformin, the skin and surgical scar is healing. He’s one of these quiet guys who don’t ever talk about pain. His wife simply said these days he’s sleeping since on metformin.
But no one had asked him about pain since on metformin or for years either. It took 30 minutes to get one little bit of information from him on pain, like pulling teeth: Since metformin, he’s had 50% relief including the nerve pain at his wrist.
She said he used to sit up all night in pain for years and was very irritable. Irritability is what happens with no sleep; pain is worse with no sleep. I could not get him to rate his pain. Stoic. Bright man, stoic. Devilish sense of humor. Severe pain for so many years he would never talk about. His surgeon had him stop the Vicodin 5/325 weeks before his last surgery “to help it heal.”
Some of his relief may have also been influenced by blood sugar dropping from 170 to 90, no more excessive thirst and urination keeping him awake, but the neuropathic pain at his wrist had been nasty a few years. Pain had kept him up for months. He had no side effects.
Metformin is a medication approved in Canada in 1972 and in the United States by the FDA in 1994 for type 2 diabetes. It is well tolerated when prescribed for people who do not have diabetes but who have other conditions such as PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome), infertility; and it is the focus of intense activity being studied for its
(1) anti-aging (PDF from Wake Forest University or the Albert Einstein Medical School Longevity study clinicaltrials.gov),
(2) anti-cancer (it “has become the focus of intense research as a potential anticancer agent” per Cancer Treat. Res. publication 2014) and now recently being studied for
(3) anti-inflammatory analgesic effects.
“Metformin increases the number of oxygen molecules released into a cell, which appears to boost robustness and longevity. It works by suppressing glucose production in the liver and increasing insulin sensitivity, therefore benefiting patients with type 2 diabetes.”
I am very interested by all the new research being done on an old drug, metformin, that has suddenly turned heads in just the last few months as we learn its mechanisms involving the pain matrix. Is this metformin some miracle drug, another hot trendy bandwagon people jump on in medicine? It’s an old drug already FDA approved, now repurposed, with excellent safety, and four months ago a publication shows it to be a glial modulator and anti-inflammatory, centrally active. Best of all, it was dramatically potent in the setting of this man’s intractable nerve and musculoskeletal pain.
But how do we get from 1994 to 2017, through the Decade of Pain, seeing patients who have astonishing pain relief without asking a single patient, millions of patients if it helped pain? A recent past president of the American Endocrine Society said: “No good data on metformin to treat pain. Everything else, but not pain.” He also said, “Safe. We do it all the time for people with PCOS, infertility, cancer, etc. The anti-aging people use it all the time. No risk of hypoglycemia. Just be sure their GFR is above 40.” So ask your doctor who may not know it’s hot research right now.
When was it first mentioned for pain?
Less than one year ago, a report on metformin’s use for pain was a 2016 poster presentation at the annual meeting of the American Pain Society from Ted Price’s lab at University Texas Dallas. “The AMPK activator metformin has been shown by our lab to reverse the effects of chronic neuropathic pain in various short term studies….The treatment successfully decreased the hypersensitivity and cold allodynia associated with neuropathic pain, and showed persistent relief for several weeks post-injection. Metformin also decreased the activation of microglia in the spinal cord.”
I have cautiously held back prescribing it for pain until I heard this man’s story a few days ago, and days later I am still astonished at the relief he had. I immediately suspected metformin must be a strong glial modulator and that mechanism was confirmed in a publication four months ago, in animal (discussed at end).
If some develop side effects, stop the medication until all side effects are zero. Then at your own body’s rate, as slowly as needed, increase if needed to 1000 mg twice daily.
If you again have side effects, again stop til all are zero. Maybe your top dose with no side effects is less than 2,000 mg/day.
More information on potential side effects are on the next metformin post – almost none in 18,000 patient years, and not a single case of lactic acidosis.
It would be extremely helpful to see a study on metformin’s use for pain in a major cancer center, including the range of all underlying diagnoses of those patients who may not be in best of health. What are % of side effects?
Metformin helps inflammation. Inflammation is the cause of 90% mortality. Almost all disease in the body begins with inflammation including atherosclerosis that leads to plaque, heart attacks, stroke. And the same risk factors for heart disease are same for Alzheimers. Inflammation manifests differently in each of us, but to relieve pain, major depression, bipolar disease, PTSD, it can be very dynamic to see response in a few hours once you have the right dose and combination of glial modulators. If this one can relieve 50% of severe chronic pain in two weeks, with few or no side effects, then millions can benefit now. It is an old generic drug repurposed for pain, that is anti-inflammatory. Best of all anti-inflammatory up there in the brain where the inflammatory cytokines produced by glia make you feel like you have the flu: difficulty thinking, fatigue, drowsy, achey, irritable, needing sleep. That is inflammation. The innate immune system going into gear to attack a virus or…..damage.
Studies reported about 2001, NIMH showed brain atrophy and memory loss in chronic depression, and about 2009 others showed the same in chronic low back pain.
My focus for years has been on inflammation in the CNS (brain, spinal cord) because NSAIDs like ibuprofen, Aleve, do not reach the CNS and do not interact on the cells of interest: glia, the cells of the innate immune system that produce a balance of anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory chemicals called cytokines. BALANCE.
Tolerance is a big issue in treating pain or major depression. I strongly recommend reading yesterday’s post on tolerance, i.e. when the body stops responding to ketamine or morphine or an antidepressant after several days or weeks or years. Inflammation may be one cause.
A publication four months ago shows metformin has both immune and glial suppressive effects that can relieve tolerance to morphine. It’s a centrally acting analgesic because that’s where chronic pain or major depression is, in the CNS.
MECHANISM of PAIN RELIEF
It has both immune and glial suppressive effects: J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Nov 17;13(1):294.
Metformin reduces morphine tolerance by inhibiting microglial-mediated neuroinflammation.
Tolerance [see post on this subject yesterday] seriously impedes the application of morphine in clinical medicine. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the exact mechanisms and efficient treatment. Microglial activation and neuroinflammation in the spinal cord are thought to play pivotal roles on the genesis and maintaining of morphine tolerance. Activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated kinase (AMPK) has been associated with the inhibition of inflammatory nociception. Metformin, a biguanide class of antidiabetic drugs and activator of AMPK, has a potential anti-inflammatory effect. The present study evaluated the effects and potential mechanisms of metformin in inhibiting microglial activation and alleviating the antinociceptive tolerance of morphine.
We found that morphine-activated BV-2 cells, including the upregulation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) phosphorylation, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) mRNA expression, which was inhibited by metformin.Metformin suppressed morphine-induced BV-2 cells activation through increasing AMPK phosphorylation, which was reversed by the AMPK inhibitor compound C. Additionally, in BV-2 cells, morphine did not affect the cell viability and the mRNA expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines. In bEnd3 cells, morphine did not affect the mRNA expression of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), but increased IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) mRNA expression; the effect was inhibited by metformin. Morphine also did not affect the mRNA expression of TLR-4 and chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). Furthermore,systemic administration of metformin significantly blocked morphine-induced microglial activation in the spinal cord and then attenuated the development of chronic morphine tolerance in mice.
Metformin significantly attenuated morphine antinociceptive tolerance by suppressing morphine-induced microglial activation through increasing AMPK phosphorylation.
Tolerance seriously impedes the application of morphine in clinical medicine. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the exact mechanisms and efficient treatment. Microglial activation and neuroinflammation in the spinal cord are thought to play pivotal roles on the genesis and maintaining of morphine tolerance. Activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated kinase (AMPK) has been associated with the inhibition of inflammatory nociception. Metformin, a biguanide class of antidiabetic drugs and activator of AMPK, has a potential anti-inflammatory effect. The present study evaluated the effects and potential mechanisms of metformin in inhibiting microglial activation and alleviating the antinociceptive tolerance of morphine.
The microglial cell line BV-2 cells and mouse brain-derived endothelial cell line bEnd3 cells were used. Cytokine expression was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Cell signaling was assayed by western blot and immunohistochemistry. The antinociception and morphine tolerance were assessed in CD-1 mice using tail-flick tests.
We found that morphine-activated BV-2 cells, including the upregulation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) phosphorylation, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) mRNA expression, which was inhibited by metformin. Metformin suppressed morphine-induced BV-2 cells activation through increasing AMPK phosphorylation, which was reversed by the AMPK inhibitor compound C. Additionally, in BV-2 cells, morphine did not affect the cell viability and the mRNA expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines. In bEnd3 cells, morphine did not affect the mRNA expression of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), but increased IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) mRNA expression; the effect was inhibited by metformin. Morphine also did not affect the mRNA expression of TLR-4 and chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). Furthermore, systemic administration of metformin significantly blocked morphine-induced microglial activation in the spinal cord and then attenuated the development of chronic morphine tolerance in mice.
Metformin significantly attenuated morphine antinociceptive tolerance by suppressing morphine-induced microglial activation through increasing AMPK phosphorylation.